Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30902736›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of learning and memory2019

The NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 fails to impair long-term recognition memory in mice when the state-dependency of memory is controlled.

Michele Chan, Joseph M Austen, Madeline J Eacott, Alexander Easton, David J Sanderson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michele ChanDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK; Centre for Learning and Memory Processes, Durham University, Durham, UK; Department of Psychology, Koç University, Rumelifeneri yolu, Sarıyer, 34450, Istanbul, Turkey(1). Electronic address: mchan@ku.edu.tr.
Joseph M AustenDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK; Centre for Learning and Memory Processes, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Madeline J EacottDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK; Centre for Learning and Memory Processes, Durham University, Durham, UK; Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, Essex CO4 3SQ, UK(1).
Alexander EastonDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK; Centre for Learning and Memory Processes, Durham University, Durham, UK.
David J SandersonDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK; Centre for Learning and Memory Processes, Durham University, Durham, UK. Electronic address: david.sanderson@durham.ac.uk.
Durham University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NMDA receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity has been proposed to be important for encoding of memories. Consistent with this hypothesis, the non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, MK-801, has been found to impair performance on tests of memory. Interpretation of some of these findings has, however, been complicated by the fact that the drug-state of animals has differed during encoding and tests of memory. Therefore, it is possible that MK-801 may result in state-dependent retrieval or expression of memory rather than actually impairing encoding itself. We tested this hypothesis in mice using tests of object recognition memory with a 24-hour delay between the encoding and test phase. Mice received injections of either vehicle or MK-801 prior to the encoding phase and the test phase. In Experiment 1, a low dose of MK-801 (0.01 mg/kg) impaired performance when the drug-state (vehicle or MK-801) of mice changed between encoding and test, but there was no significant effect of MK-801 on encoding. In Experiment 2, a higher dose of MK-801 (0.1 mg/kg) failed to impair object recognition memory when mice received the drug prior to both encoding and test compared to mice that received vehicle. MK-801 did not affect object exploration, but it did induce locomotor hyperactivity at the higher dose. These results suggest that some previous demonstrations of MK-801 effects may reflect a failure to express or retrieve memory due to the state-dependency of memory rather than impaired encoding of memory.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalDizocilpine MaleateExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsFemaleHabituation, PsychophysiologicMemory, Long-TermMiceMice, Inbred C57BLReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateRecognition, PsychologyDizocilpine MaleateExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateHabituationMemoryMiceMK-801NMDA receptors

Identifiers

PMID30902736
PMCPMC6542379
OpenAlexW2924410810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.