Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30902115›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychology2019

The General Health Questionnaire-28 (GHQ-28) as an outcome measurement in a randomized controlled trial in a Norwegian stroke population.

Ellen G Hjelle, Line Kildal Bragstad, Manuela Zucknick, Marit Kirkevold, Bente Thommessen, Unni Sveen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02338869 (Psycho-Social Well Being Following Stroke - A Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02338869 nacompletednot on this map

Psycho-Social Well Being Following Stroke - A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OsloRan2014 to 2018Enrolled322ConditionsStrokeArmsDialogue-based psychosocial rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ellen G HjelleDepartment of Nursing Science, and Research Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Services and Models (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. e.g.hjelle@medisin.uio.no.
Line Kildal BragstadDepartment of Nursing Science, and Research Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Services and Models (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Manuela ZucknickOslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Marit KirkevoldDepartment of Nursing Science, and Research Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Services and Models (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Bente ThommessenDepartment of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lorenskog, Norway.
Unni SveenDepartment of Geriatric Medicine and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

The European Union Seventh Framework Programme FP7-PEOPLE-2013-COFUNDThe Extra Foundation 2015/FO13753The South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority 2013086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral studies have documented the variety of post-stroke psychosocial challenges, which are complex, multifaceted, and affect a patient's rehabilitation and recovery. Due to the consequences of these challenges, psychosocial well-being should be considered an important outcome of the stroke rehabilitation. Thus, a valid and reliable instrument that is appropriate for the stroke population is required. The factor structure of the Norwegian version of GHQ-28 has not previously been examined when applied to a stroke population. The purpose of this study was to explore the psychometric properties of the GHQ-28 when applied in the stroke population included in the randomized controlled trial; "Psychosocial well-being following stroke", by evaluating the internal consistency, exploring the factor structure, construct validity and measurement invariance.

methodsData were obtained from 322 individuals with a stroke onset within the past month. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test was used to test the sampling adequacy for exploratory factor analysis, and the Bartlett's test of sphericity was used to test equal variances. Internal consistency was analysed using Cronbach's alpha. The factor structure of the GHQ-28 was evaluated by exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to determine the goodness of fit to the original structure of the outcome measurement. Measurement invariance for two time points was evaluated by configural, metric and scalar invariance.

resultsThe results from the EFA supported the four-factor dimensionality, but some of the items were loaded on different factors compared to those of the original structure. The differences resulted in a reduced goodness of fit in the CFA. Measurement invariance at two time points was confirmed.

conclusionsThe change in mean score from one to six months on the GHQ-28 and the factor composition are assumed to be affected by characteristics in the stroke population. The results, when applying the GHQ-28 in a stroke population, and sub-factor analysis based on the original factor structure should be interpreted with caution.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02338869 , registered 10/04/2014.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareStrokeSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultFactor analysisPsychometric propertiesQuality of lifeStroke

Identifiers

PMID30902115
PMCPMC6431023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.