ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2019
Predicting factors for survival of breast cancer patients using machine learning techniques.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
79 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- 5-year survival rate and determinants of decreased survival among patients with breast cancer in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ global health · 2026Pooled it
- Breast cancer survival in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of rates and predictors.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Pooled it
- Digital health interventions for cervical cancer care: A systematic review and future research opportunities.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Predicting breast cancer 5-year survival using machine learning: A systematic review.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Machine learning predicts portal vein thrombosis after splenectomy in patients with portal hypertension: Comparative analysis of three practical models.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Trial
- Identification of Prognostic Factors in Esophageal Cancer Using Machine Learning: A Retrospective Study Based on the SEER Database.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Predicting adverse prognostic outcomes in hospitalized breast cancer patients: development and validation of a risk model.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Transforming unstructured breast cancer pathology reports into the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Affordable care act and 4-year all-cause mortality among U.S. working-age adults with or without cancer: 2000-2015.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence improves risk stratification for breast cancer recurrence and mortality in women exposed to pesticides: a call for reassessment of stratification criteria.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Assessment of transformer-based AI in clinical oncology.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Advancements in Cancer Survival Prediction: A Systematic Review of Classical and Modern Approaches.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2025Review
- The effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on M0 adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast: a retrospective cohort study based on SEER data.Gland surgery · 2025Article
- Observational
- Refining cancer prediction with DNA sequencing and combined machine learning approaches.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Using machine learning and electronic health record (EHR) data for the early prediction of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Article
- Article
- Bayesian Model Prediction for Breast Cancer Survival: A Retrospective Analysis.European journal of breast health · 2025Article
- Single cell analysis and bioinformatics reveal pyroptosis mechanisms in hepatocellular carcinoma.Discover oncology · 2025Article
19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer is one of the most common diseases in women worldwide. Many studies have been conducted to predict the survival indicators, however most of these analyses were predominantly performed using basic statistical methods. As an alternative, this study used machine learning techniques to build models for detecting and visualising significant prognostic indicators of breast cancer survival rate.
methodsA large hospital-based breast cancer dataset retrieved from the University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (n = 8066) with diagnosis information between 1993 and 2016 was used in this study. The dataset contained 23 predictor variables and one dependent variable, which referred to the survival status of the patients (alive or dead). In determining the significant prognostic factors of breast cancer survival rate, prediction models were built using decision tree, random forest, neural networks, extreme boost, logistic regression, and support vector machine. Next, the dataset was clustered based on the receptor status of breast cancer patients identified via immunohistochemistry to perform advanced modelling using random forest. Subsequently, the important variables were ranked via variable selection methods in random forest. Finally, decision trees were built and validation was performed using survival analysis.
resultsIn terms of both model accuracy and calibration measure, all algorithms produced close outcomes, with the lowest obtained from decision tree (accuracy = 79.8%) and the highest from random forest (accuracy = 82.7%). The important variables identified in this study were cancer stage classification, tumour size, number of total axillary lymph nodes removed, number of positive lymph nodes, types of primary treatment, and methods of diagnosis.
conclusionInterestingly the various machine learning algorithms used in this study yielded close accuracy hence these methods could be used as alternative predictive tools in the breast cancer survival studies, particularly in the Asian region. The important prognostic factors influencing survival rate of breast cancer identified in this study, which were validated by survival curves, are useful and could be translated into decision support tools in the medical domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.