Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30901832›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Analysis of Enantiomers in Products of Food Interest.

Chiara Fanali, Giovanni D'Orazio, Alessandra Gentili, Salvatore Fanali

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dimethylcysteine (DiCys)/Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chiara FanaliDepartment of Medicine, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, Italy. c.fanali@unicampus.it.
Giovanni D'OrazioIstituto per I Sistemi Biologici, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Salaria km 29, 300-00015 Monterotondo, Italy. giovanni.dorazio@cnr.it.
Alessandra GentiliDepartment of Chemistry, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, P.O. Box 34, Posta 62, 00185 Roma, Italy. alessandra.gentili@uniroma1.it.
Salvatore FanaliTeaching Committee of Ph.D. School in Natural Science and Engineering, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy. salvatore.fanali@gmail.com.
Istituto di Biologia e Biotecnologia Agraria · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The separation of enantiomers has been started in the past and continues to be a topic of great interest in various fields of research, mainly because these compounds could be involved in biological processes such as, for example, those related to human health. Great attention has been devoted to studies for the analysis of enantiomers present in food products in order to assess authenticity and safety. The separation of these compounds can be carried out utilizing analytical techniques such as gas chromatography, high-performance liquid chromatography, supercritical fluid chromatography, and other methods. The separation is performed mainly employing chromatographic columns containing particles modified with chiral selectors (CS). Among the CS used, modified polysaccharides, glycopeptide antibiotics, and cyclodextrins are currently applied.

Indexed as

FoodFood AnalysisChemical FractionationChromatographyChromatography, High Pressure LiquidChromatography, LiquidMass SpectrometryMolecular Structurechiralchiral stationary phasesenantiomersfoodreview

Identifiers

PMID30901832
PMCPMC6472275
OpenAlexW2923211359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.