Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30901730›Full record

ArticleNeoplasia (New York, N.Y.)2019

Characterization of the ERG-regulated Kinome in Prostate Cancer Identifies TNIK as a Potential Therapeutic Target.

Rachel S Lee, Luxi Zhang, Adeline Berger, Mitchell G Lawrence, Jiangning Song, Birunthi Niranjan, Rebecca G Davies, Natalie L Lister, Shahneen K Sandhu, Mark A Rubin and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. TNIK in disease: from molecular insights to therapeutic prospects.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Hypermethylation ofEXCLI journal · 2022
    Article
  14. Wnt/β-catenin signaling in cancers and targeted therapies.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Androgen-Driven Fusion Genes and Chimeric Transcripts in Prostate Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Rachel S LeeCancer Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Luxi ZhangCancer Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Adeline BergerDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Mitchell G LawrenceCancer Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jiangning SongInfection and Immunity Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Monash Centre for Data Science, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Birunthi NiranjanCancer Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Rebecca G DaviesDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Natalie L ListerCancer Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Shahneen K SandhuSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Division of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Mark A RubinDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA; Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA; Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Gail P RisbridgerCancer Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Division of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Renea A TaylorCancer Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Physiology, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
David S RickmanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA; Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Lisa G HorvathChris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, New South Wales, Australia; Garvan Institute for Medical Research, New South Wales, Australia.
Roger J DalyCancer Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: roger.daly@monash.edu.
Monash University · AUAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AUChris O’Brien Lifehouse · AUCornell University · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AUWeill Cornell Medicine · US

Funding

Mechanistic Insights Underlying ERG-induced Taxane Resistance in Castration-ResisR01CA179100 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI GIANNAKAKOU, PARASKEVI, RICKMAN, DAVID S. · 2014 to 2018
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA179100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 50% of prostate cancers harbor the TMPRSS2:ERG fusion, resulting in elevated expression of the ERG transcription factor. Despite the identification of this subclass of prostate cancers, no personalized therapeutic strategies have achieved clinical implementation. Kinases are attractive therapeutic targets as signaling networks are commonly perturbed in cancers. The impact of elevated ERG expression on kinase signaling networks in prostate cancer has not been investigated. Resolution of this issue may identify novel therapeutic approaches for ERG-positive prostate cancers. In this study, we used quantitative mass spectrometry-based kinomic profiling to identify ERG-mediated changes to cellular signaling networks. We identified 76 kinases that were differentially expressed and/or phosphorylated in DU145 cells engineered to express ERG. In particular, the Traf2 and Nck-interacting kinase (TNIK) was markedly upregulated and phosphorylated on multiple sites upon ERG overexpression. Importantly, TNIK has not previously been implicated in prostate cancer. To validate the clinical relevance of these findings, we characterized expression of TNIK and TNIK phosphorylated at serine 764 (pS764) in a localized prostate cancer patient cohort and showed that nuclear enrichment of TNIK (pS764) was significantly positively correlated with ERG expression. Moreover, TNIK protein levels were dependent upon ERG expression in VCaP cells and primary cells established from a prostate cancer patient-derived xenograft. Furthermore, reduction of TNIK expression and activity by silencing TNIK expression or using the TNIK inhibitor NCB-0846 reduced cell viability, colony formation and anchorage independent growth. Therefore, TNIK represents a novel and actionable therapeutic target for ERG-positive prostate cancers that could be exploited to develop new treatments for these patients.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticBiomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorGene Expression ProfilingGene Knockdown TechniquesGerminal Center KinasesHumansMaleMolecular Targeted TherapyProstatic NeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRNA InterferenceRNA, Small InterferingTranscriptional Regulator ERGBiomarkers, TumorGerminal Center KinasesProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRNA, Small InterferingTNIK protein, humanTranscriptional Regulator ERG

Identifiers

PMID30901730
PMCPMC6426874
OpenAlexW2923560887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.