ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2019
Reduced left-lateralized pattern of event-related EEG oscillations in infants at familial risk for language and learning impairment.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Utilizing functional neuroimaging to study early language development.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2025Review
- EEG neurosubtyping of infants predicts language trajectories.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025Article
- EEG neurosubtyping of infants predicts language trajectories.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025Article
- The Development of Lateralized Brain Oscillations in Infants: Lessons From Autism.Developmental psychobiology · 2025Article
- Prenatal brain connectivity and postnatal language: how familial risk and prenatal speech exposure shape early language skills.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Attentional and electrophysiological associations with executive function ability in young autistic children.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Auditory evoked delta brushes involve stimulus-specific cortical networks in preterm infants.iScience · 2025Article
- Resting-State Electroencephalogram and Speech Perception in Young Children with Developmental Language Disorder.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Socioeconomic Inequalities Affect Brain Responses of Infants Growing Up in Germany.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Neural processing of rhythmic speech by children with developmental language disorder (DLD): An EEG study.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Does Electrophysiological Maturation Shape Language Acquisition?Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023Article
- Experience-dependent effects of passive auditory exposure in infants impact theta phase synchrony and predict later language.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Sensory temporal sampling in time: an integrated model of the TSF and neural noise hypothesis as an etiological pathway for dyslexia.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Review
- Impact of feeding habits on the development of language-specific processing of phonemes in brain: An event-related potentials study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Intergenerational longitudinal associations between parental reading/musical traits, infants' auditory processing, and later phonological awareness skills.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Evaluating Head Models for Cortical Source Localization of the Face-Sensitive N290 Component in Infants.Brain topography · 2022Article
- Cortical Source Analysis of Event-Related Potentials: A Developmental Approach.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2022Article
- Music-based and auditory-based interventions for reading difficulties: A literature review.Heliyon · 2022Review
- Modulation of Theta Phase Synchrony during Syllable Processing as a Function of Interactive Acoustic Experience in Infancy.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to rapidly discriminate successive auditory stimuli within tens-of-milliseconds is crucial for speech and language development, particularly in the first year of life. This skill, called Rapid Auditory Processing (RAP), is altered in infants at familial risk for language and learning impairment (LLI) and is a robust predictor of later language outcomes. In the present study, we investigate the neural substrates of RAP, i.e., the underlying neural oscillatory patterns, in a group of Italian 6-month-old infants at risk for LLI (FH+, n = 24), compared to control infants with no known family history of LLI (FH-, n = 32). Brain responses to rapid changes in fundamental frequency and duration were recorded via high-density electroencephalogram during a non-speech double oddball paradigm. Sources of event-related potential generators were localized to right and left auditory regions in both FH+ and FH- groups. Time-frequency analyses showed variations in both theta (Ɵ) and gamma (ɣ) ranges across groups. Our results showed that overall RAP stimuli elicited a more left-lateralized pattern of oscillations in FH- infants, whereas FH+ infants demonstrated a more right-lateralized pattern, in both the theta and gamma frequency bands. Interestingly, FH+ infants showed reduced early left gamma power (starting at 50 ms after stimulus onset) during deviant discrimination. Perturbed oscillatory dynamics may well constitute a candidate neural mechanism to explain group differences in RAP. Additional group differences in source location suggest that anatomical variations may underlie differences in oscillatory activity. Regarding the predictive value of early oscillatory measures, we found that the amplitude of the source response and the magnitude of oscillatory power and phase synchrony were predictive of expressive vocabulary at 20 months of age. These results further our understanding of the interplay among neural mechanisms that support typical and atypical rapid auditory processing in infancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.