Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30901632›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in virology2019

The intersection of sex and gender in the treatment of influenza.

Rosemary Morgan, Sabra L Klein

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in virology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Sex, hormones, and lung health.Physiological reviews · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Disparities in Seasonal Influenza Vaccination in Europe.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Why do we keep ignoring sex in kidney disease?Clinical kidney journal · 2023
    Review
  19. Weed, sex and influenza.ERJ open research · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rosemary MorganDepartment of International Health, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sabra L KleinW. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: sklein2@jhu.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Sex differences in the impact of frailty on vaccine-induced immune responses in community-dwelling older adultsU54AG062333 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KLEIN, SABRA L. · 2018 to 2022
$8.9M
NIA NIH HHS U54 AG062333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Males/men and females/women differ in the outcome of influenza A virus (IAV) infections, vaccination, and antiviral treatments. Both sex (i.e. biological factors) and gender (i.e. sociocultural factors) can impact exposure and severity of IAV infections as well as responses and outcomes of treatments for IAV. Greater consideration of the combined effects of sex and gender in epidemiological, clinical, and animal studies of influenza pathogenesis is needed.

Indexed as

Gender IdentitySex FactorsAnimalsAntiviral AgentsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansInfluenza, HumanMaleOrthomyxoviridaeOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsAntiviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID30901632
PMCPMC6556398
OpenAlexW2923988844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.