ArticleMilitary medicine2019
Formative Assessment of Performance in Diagnostic Ultrasound Using Simulation and Quantitative and Objective Metrics.
Article in Military medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation-based training on clinical skill transfer in obstetric ultrasound residents: a prospective randomized controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Evaluating the use of BodyWorks Eve® high-fidelity ultrasound simulation equipment in formative clinical assessments.Ultrasound (Leeds, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe developed simulator-based tools for assessing provider competence in transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and vascular duplex scanning.
methodsPsychomotor (technical) skill in TTE image acquisition was calculated from the deviation angle of an acquired image from the anatomically correct view. We applied this metric for formative assessment to give feedback to learners and evaluate curricula.Psychomotor skill in vascular ultrasound was measured in terms of dexterity and image plane location; cognitive skill was assessed from measurements of blood flow velocity, parameter settings, and diagnosis. The validity of the vascular simulator was assessed from the accuracy with which experts can measure peak systolic blood flow velocity (PSV).
resultsIn the TTE simulator, the skill metric enabled immediate feedback, formative assessment of curriculum efficacy, and comparison of curriculum outcomes. The vascular duplex ultrasound simulator also provided feedback, and experts' measurements of PSV deviated from actual PSV in the model by <10%.
conclusionsSkill in acquiring diagnostic ultrasound images of organs and vessels can be measured using simulation in an objective, quantitative, and standardized manner. Current applications are provision of feedback to learners to enable training without direct faculty oversight and formative assessment of curricula. Simulator-based metrics could also be applied for summative assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.