ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2019
Regional Variations and Intra-/Intersession Repeatability for Scotopic Sensitivity in Normal Controls and Patients With Inherited Retinal Degenerations.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bisretinoid lipofuscin, fundus autofluorescence and retinal disease.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2025Review
- Improved Rod Sensitivity as Assessed by Two-Color Dark-Adapted Perimetry in Patients With RPE65-Related Retinopathy Treated With Voretigene Neparvovec-rzyl.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Article
- Delineating the Clinical Phenotype of Patients With the c.629C>G, p.Pro210Arg Mutation in Peripherin-2.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022Article
- Choroideremia Carriers: Dark-Adapted Perimetry and Retinal Structures.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022Article
- Spatial and temporal resolution of the photoreceptors rescue dynamics after treatment with voretigene neparvovec.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- The RUSH2A Study: Dark-Adapted Visual Fields in Patients With Retinal Degeneration Associated With Biallelic Variants in the USH2A Gene.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022Article
- Effect of Pharmacological Pupil Dilation on Dark-Adapted Perimetric Sensitivity in Healthy Subjects Using an Octopus 900 Perimeter.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
- Adherent but Not Suspension-Cultured Embryoid Bodies Develop into Laminated Retinal Organoids.Journal of developmental biology · 2021Article
- Scotopic thresholds on dark-adapted chromatic perimetry in healthy aging and age-related macular degeneration.Scientific reports · 2021Observational
- Repeatability of Scotopic Sensitivity and Dark Adaptation Using a Medmont Dark-Adapted Chromatic Perimeter in Age-related Macular Degeneration.Translational vision science & technology · 2020Article
- Disease Progression in Patients with Autosomal Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa due to a Mutation in Inosine Monophosphate Dehydrogenase 1 (IMPDH1).Translational vision science & technology · 2020Article
- Reliability of Mesopic Measures of Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity and Their Correlation with Rod and Cone Function in Retinitis Pigmentosa.Ophthalmic research · 2020Article
- Multimodal Imaging and Dark-Adapted Chromatic Perimetry in BEST1 Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy: Identification of Outcome Measurements.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Dark-adapted visual fields were obtained from patients with inherited retinal degeneration (IRD) and controls to evaluate the effect that age, retinal region, and disease had on scotopic sensitivity. Intra- and intersession test-retest repeatabilities for patients and controls were measured to establish significant change for longitudinal studies. Methods: A total of 41 patients with IRD and 30 controls had one eye dilated and dark-adapted for 40 minutes. Scotopic sensitivity was measured with a Medmont dark-adapted chromatic (DAC) perimeter (size V stimulus, 200-ms duration, background luminance < 0.0001 cd/m2, dynamic range 0-75 decibel [dB]). Mixed effects analysis was performed to analyze age, retinal eccentricity, and sensitivity. The intra-/intersession coefficients of repeatability (CR) were calculated for controls and patients with IRD. Results: Each additional year was associated with lower sensitivity (-0.22 dB) per year in normal controls over age 50 compared to younger controls (12-49 years). The superior field had lower sensitivity than the inferior, but the nasal field was not different compared to the temporal field in normal controls. The CR for intra- and intersession testing on mean sensitivity (MS)/pointwise sensitivity (PWS) were ±1.5/±8.5 and ±3.3/±9.8 dB, respectively, for patients with IRD. Control MS/PWS CR were ±1.5/±6.1 dB for intrasession and ±1.7/±6.8 dB for intersession DAC perimetry. Conclusions: The DAC perimeter is an important asset because it tests a wide field of scotopic vision. The CR are comparable to those of other perimetry devices. Effects of age and retinal region should be considered when assessing scotopic sensitivity measured with the DAC perimeter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.