Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30901388›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2019

Regional Variations and Intra-/Intersession Repeatability for Scotopic Sensitivity in Normal Controls and Patients With Inherited Retinal Degenerations.

Lea D Bennett, Georgiana Metz, Martin Klein, Kirsten G Locke, Areeba Khwaja, David G Birch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Choroideremia Carriers: Dark-Adapted Perimetry and Retinal Structures.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lea D BennettRetina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, Texas, United States.
Georgiana MetzRetina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, Texas, United States.
Martin KleinRetina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, Texas, United States.
Kirsten G LockeRetina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, Texas, United States.
Areeba KhwajaRetina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, Texas, United States.
David G BirchRetina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, Texas, United States.
Retina Foundation of the Southwest · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

MEASURES OF HUMAN RECEPTOR AND POST RECEPTOR ACTIVITYR01EY009076 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI BIRCH, DAVID G, HOOD, DONALD C. · 1991 to 2021
$8.3M
Genotype phenotype associations in inherited retinal degenerationR00EY027460 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI BENNETT, LEA D · 2018 to 2020
$747k
Rod photoreceptor function in retinitis pigmentosaK99EY027460 · NEI · RETINA FOUNDATION OF THE SOUTHWEST · PI BENNETT, LEA D · 2017 to 2018
$187k
NEI NIH HHS K99 EY027460NEI NIH HHS R00 EY027460NEI NIH HHS R01 EY009076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Dark-adapted visual fields were obtained from patients with inherited retinal degeneration (IRD) and controls to evaluate the effect that age, retinal region, and disease had on scotopic sensitivity. Intra- and intersession test-retest repeatabilities for patients and controls were measured to establish significant change for longitudinal studies. Methods: A total of 41 patients with IRD and 30 controls had one eye dilated and dark-adapted for 40 minutes. Scotopic sensitivity was measured with a Medmont dark-adapted chromatic (DAC) perimeter (size V stimulus, 200-ms duration, background luminance < 0.0001 cd/m2, dynamic range 0-75 decibel [dB]). Mixed effects analysis was performed to analyze age, retinal eccentricity, and sensitivity. The intra-/intersession coefficients of repeatability (CR) were calculated for controls and patients with IRD. Results: Each additional year was associated with lower sensitivity (-0.22 dB) per year in normal controls over age 50 compared to younger controls (12-49 years). The superior field had lower sensitivity than the inferior, but the nasal field was not different compared to the temporal field in normal controls. The CR for intra- and intersession testing on mean sensitivity (MS)/pointwise sensitivity (PWS) were ±1.5/±8.5 and ±3.3/±9.8 dB, respectively, for patients with IRD. Control MS/PWS CR were ±1.5/±6.1 dB for intrasession and ±1.7/±6.8 dB for intersession DAC perimetry. Conclusions: The DAC perimeter is an important asset because it tests a wide field of scotopic vision. The CR are comparable to those of other perimetry devices. Effects of age and retinal region should be considered when assessing scotopic sensitivity measured with the DAC perimeter.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedChildDark AdaptationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedNight VisionObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsRetinaRetinal Degeneration

Identifiers

PMID30901388
PMCPMC6432803
OpenAlexW2941765788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.