Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30901377›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Trends in polypharmacy and dispensed drugs among adults in the Netherlands as compared to the United States.

Monika P Oktora, Petra Denig, Jens H J Bos, Catharina C M Schuiling-Veninga, Eelko Hak

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs in older people.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs in older people.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Prevalence and Predicting Risk Factors of Polypharmacy in Azar Cohort Population.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Monika P OktoraUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3116-787X
Petra DenigUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jens H J BosUniversity of Groningen, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Unit of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology and -Economics, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Catharina C M Schuiling-VeningaUniversity of Groningen, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Unit of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology and -Economics, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Eelko HakUniversity of Groningen, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Unit of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology and -Economics, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University of Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposePolypharmacy is becoming increasingly common owing to the ageing population, which can pose problems for patients and society. We investigated the trends in polypharmacy and underlying drug groups among adults in the Netherlands from 1999 to 2014 stratified by age, and compared these with findings from the United States (US).

methodsWe conducted a repeated cross-sectional study using the Dutch IADB.nl prescription database. All patients aged 20 years and older in the period 1999 to 2014 were included. Polypharmacy was defined as the dispensing of five or more chronic drugs at the pharmacological subgroup level. Chi-square tests were applied to calculate the p-value for trends. Changes in prevalences were compared between the Netherlands and the US.

resultsThe prevalence of polypharmacy increased from 3.1% to 8.0% (p-value for trend <0.001) over 15 years, and increased in all age groups. The highest rates were observed in patients aged ≥65 years, but the relative increase over time was higher in the younger age groups. Overall, large increases were observed for angiotensin-II inhibitors, statins and proton-pump inhibitors. The relative increase in polypharmacy was larger in the Netherlands than in the US (ratio of polypharmacy prevalence 2.4 versus 1.8). The Netherlands showed larger relative increases for angiotensin-II inhibitors, statins, proton-pump inhibitors, biguanides and smaller relative increases for antidepressants, benzodiazepines and insulins.

conclusionsPolypharmacy more than doubled from 1999 to 2014, and this increase was not limited to the elderly. The relative increase was larger in the Netherlands compared to the US, which was partly due to larger increases in several guideline-recommended preventive drugs.

Indexed as

PolypharmacyAdultAgedAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPrescription DrugsUnited StatesYoung AdultPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID30901377
PMCPMC6430511
OpenAlexW2923137722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.