Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30901364›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Morphological characteristics and microstructure of kidney stones using synchrotron radiation μCT reveal the mechanism of crystal growth and aggregation in mixed stones.

Muhammed A P Manzoor, Ashish K Agrawal, Balwant Singh, M Mujeeburahiman, Punchappady-Devasya Rekha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Theranostic roles of machine learning in clinical management of kidney stone disease.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Microstructural diversity of gallstones revealed by spectral microanalyses and their association with hepatic parameters.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Muhammed A P ManzoorYenepoya Research Centre, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Ashish K AgrawalTechnical Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Indore-Mumbai, India.
Balwant SinghTechnical Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Indore-Mumbai, India.
M MujeeburahimanDepartment of Urology, Yenepoya Medical College, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
Punchappady-Devasya RekhaYenepoya Research Centre, Yenepoya (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9187-6395

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms of kidney stone formation, development patterns and associated pathological features are gaining importance due to an increase in the prevalence of the disease and diversity in the presentation of the stone composition. Based on the microstructural characteristics of kidney stones, it may be possible to explain the differences in the pathogenesis of pure and mixed types of stones. In this study, the microstructure and distribution of mineral components of kidney stones of different mineralogy (pure and mixed types) were analyzed. The intact stones removed from patients were investigated using synchrotron radiation X-ray computed microtomography (SR-μCT) and the tomography slice images were reconstructed representing the density and structure distribution at various elevation planes. Infrared (IR) spectroscopes, X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used to confirm the bulk mineral composition in the thin section stones. Observations revealed differences in the micro-morphology of the kidney stones with similar composition in the internal 3-D structure. Calcium oxalate monohydrate stones showed well-organised layering patterns, while uric acid stones showed lower absorption signals with homogenous inner structure. Distinct mineral phases in the mixed types were identified based on the differential absorption rates. The 3-D quantitative analysis of internal porosity and spatial variation between nine different types of stones were compared. The diversity among the microstructure of similar and different types of stones shows that the stone formation is complex and may be governed by both physiological and micro-environmental factors. These factors may predispose a few towards crystal aggregation and stone growth, while, in others the crystals may not establish stable attachment and/or growth.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCalcium OxalateCrystallizationFemaleHumansKidney CalculiMaleMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningMiddle AgedMineralsSpectrophotometry, InfraredSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredSynchrotronsTomography, X-Ray ComputedX-Ray DiffractionCalcium OxalateMinerals

Identifiers

PMID30901364
PMCPMC6430423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.