Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30901343›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Performance and usability of Cepheid GeneXpert HIV-1 qualitative and quantitative assay in Kenya.

Priska Bwana, Joshua Ageng'o, Matilu Mwau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Timeliness of Point-of-Care Viral Load Results Improves Human Immunodeficiency Virus Monitoring in Nigeria.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Priska BwanaKenya Medical Research Institute, Busia, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-7368-5982
Joshua Ageng'oKenya Medical Research Institute, Busia, Kenya.
Matilu MwauKenya Medical Research Institute, Busia, Kenya.
Kenya Medical Research Institute · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Kenya, access to early infant diagnosis and viral load monitoring services for HIV patients on ART is significantly hampered by sample transportation challenges and long turnaround times. Near patient care testing technologies have the potential to obviate such constraints. The Cepheid GeneXpert was launched in 2010 as a TB assay and in 2014 as a potential point of care HIV viral load assay. Whereas it is widely is used for TB in Kenya, its utility for HIV testing has not been evaluated.

objectiveTo investigate the performance and usability characteristics of the GeneXpert HIV-1 qualitative and quantitative assay.

methodsThis was a cross sectional study among 911 HIV Exposed infants and 310 HIV positive adults. Existing machines used for routine TB diagnosis were used in this study. The diagnostic accuracy of the qualitative assay was assessed using Roche CAP/CTM while the quantitative assay was assessed using with Abbott m2000 as the reference assays respectively. Statistical analysis was done using Stata/MP Version 14 for Mac. Concordance values and misclassification were calculated at the clinical cutoff of 1000 cp/ml.

resultsThe sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the GeneXpert HIV-1 qualitative assay were 99.23% (95% CI 97.24-99.90%), 98.91% (95% CI 97.76-99.55%) and 99.00% respectively. For the quantitative assay, they were 92.50% (95% CI 79.61-98.43%), 100.00% and 97.00% respectively. All 30 (100%) users reported that the GeneXpert machine was easy to use, workflow was simple and TB diagnosis was not negatively affected. In our hands, the median turn-around time for an individual qualitative and quantitative test was 90 minutes. A total of 58 (4.34%) errors and 28 (2.10%) invalid outcomes were experienced; 44 (3.29%) tests did not run to completion due to power outages.

conclusionGeneXpert HIV-1 qualitative and quantitative assay is an accurate test for the diagnosis of HIV in infants and for viral load monitoring. At the point of care, the GeneXpert machine's simple work flow, ease of use and short test turnaround time present the potential to improve access to HIV testing and viral load monitoring. To integrate HIV diagnosis into the existing GeneXpert platforms for TB Diagnosis, there is need to scale up the infrastructure and to change the way work is done.

Indexed as

Reagent Kits, DiagnosticCross-Sectional StudiesHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansInfantKenyaReproducibility of ResultsRNA, ViralViral LoadReagent Kits, DiagnosticRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID30901343
PMCPMC6430374
OpenAlexW2990710898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.