ArticlePLoS computational biology2019
Rapid interpretation of small-angle X-ray scattering data.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of biomolecular emulator for characterizing flexible proteins by small-angle x-ray scattering.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- Structural Characterization of Nucleic Acid Nanoparticles Using SAXS and SAXS-Driven MD.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Visualizing RNA Structures by SAXS-Driven MD Simulations.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Contrast variation SAXS: Sample preparation protocols, experimental procedures, and data analysis.Methods in enzymology · 2022Article
- CoCoNet-boosting RNA contact prediction by convolutional neural networks.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Quantitative comparison between sub-millisecond time resolution single-molecule FRET measurements and 10-second molecular simulations of a biosensor protein.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Combining Experimental Data and Computational Methods for the Non-Computer Specialist.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Evaluating DCA-based method performances for RNA contact prediction by a well-curated data set.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Article
- Including residual contact information into replica-exchange MD simulations significantly enriches native-like conformations.PloS one · 2020Article
- Evolving SAXS versatility: solution X-ray scattering for macromolecular architecture, functional landscapes, and integrative structural biology.Current opinion in structural biology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The fundamental aim of structural analyses in biophysics is to reveal a mutual relation between a molecule's dynamic structure and its physiological function. Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) is an experimental technique for structural characterization of macromolecules in solution and enables time-resolved analysis of conformational changes under physiological conditions. As such experiments measure spatially averaged low-resolution scattering intensities only, the sparse information obtained is not sufficient to uniquely reconstruct a three-dimensional atomistic model. Here, we integrate the information from SAXS into molecular dynamics simulations using computationally efficient native structure-based models. Dynamically fitting an initial structure towards a scattering intensity, such simulations produce atomistic models in agreement with the target data. In this way, SAXS data can be rapidly interpreted while retaining physico-chemical knowledge and sampling power of the underlying force field. We demonstrate our method's performance using the example of three protein systems. Simulations are faster than full molecular dynamics approaches by more than two orders of magnitude and consistently achieve comparable accuracy. Computational demands are reduced sufficiently to run the simulations on commodity desktop computers instead of high-performance computing systems. These results underline that scattering-guided structure-based simulations provide a suitable framework for rapid early-stage refinement of structures towards SAXS data with particular focus on minimal computational resources and time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.