Cumulative Sulfate Loads Shift Porewater to Sulfidic Conditions in Freshwater Wetland Sediment.

Nathan W Johnson, John Pastor, Edward B Swain

Open access · hybridAbstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nathan W JohnsonDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9912-6281

John PastorDepartment of Biology, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota, USA.

Edward B SwainMinnesota Pollution Control Agency, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Minnesota, Duluth · US

Funding

Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior ChippewaMinnesota Pollution Control AgencyMinnesota Sea Grant, University of Minnesota NA14OAR4170080 from Minnesota Sea GrantMinnesota Sea Grant, University of Minnesota National

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well established that sulfide can be toxic to rooted aquatic plants. However, a detailed description of the effects of cumulative sulfate loads on sulfide and iron (Fe) porewater geochemistry, plant exposure, and ecological response is lacking. Over 4 yr, we experimentally manipulated sulfate loads to self-perpetuating wild rice (Zizania palustris) populations and monitored increases in the ratio of sulfur (S) to Fe in sediment across a range of sulfide loading rates driven by overlying water sulfate. Because natural settings are complicated by ongoing Fe and S loads from surface and groundwater, this experimental setting provides a tractable system to describe the impacts of increased S loading on Fe-S porewater geochemistry. In the experimental mesocosms, the rate of sulfide accumulation in bulk sediment increased linearly with overlying water sulfate concentration up to 300 µg-SO

Indexed as

WetlandsFresh WaterGeologic SedimentsIronPlant DevelopmentPoaceaePorosityReproductionSulfatesSulfidesWaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalIronSulfatesSulfidesWaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalPorewaterRooting zoneSulfideWetland sedimentWild rice

Identifiers

PMID30901093

DOI10.1002/etc.4410

PMCPMC6852076

OpenAlexW2936906909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.