Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30901049›Full record

Observational studyJAMA network open2019

Analysis of Diagnoses, Symptoms, Medications, and Admissions Among Patients With Cancer Presenting to Emergency Departments.

Jeffrey M Caterino, David Adler, Danielle D Durham, Sai-Ching Jim Yeung, Matthew F Hudson, Aveh Bastani, Steven L Bernstein, Christopher W Baugh, Christopher J Coyne, Corita R Grudzen and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
17.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 156 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Symptom Networks in Postsurgical Cancer Pain Across Recovery Stages.Pain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses · 2026
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Opioid prescribing patterns at the end of life in an asian advanced cancer cohort: differences by palliative care consultation status.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Impact of an oncology urgent care center on preventable emergency department visits: revisiting lessons from a global pandemic to improve quality of care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  15. Characteristics associated with accepting hospital at home among patients with cancer and their caregivers: a cross-sectional survey.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey M CaterinoDepartment of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus.
David AdlerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Danielle D DurhamHealthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.
Sai-Ching Jim YeungDepartment of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Matthew F HudsonGreenville Health System Cancer Institute, Greenville, South Carolina.
Aveh BastaniDepartment of Emergency Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital-Troy Campus, Troy, Michigan.
Steven L BernsteinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Christopher W BaughDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Christopher J CoyneDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Diego.
Corita R GrudzenRonald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine and Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York.
Daniel J HenningDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Adam KlotzDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Troy E MadsenDivision of Emergency Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Daniel J PallinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cielito C Reyes-GibbyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Juan Felipe RicoDepartment of Pediatrics, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa.
Richard J RyanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Nathan I ShapiroDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconness Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Robert SworDepartment of Emergency Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan.
Arvind VenkatDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Jason WilsonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa.
Charles R ThomasDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland.
Jason J BischofDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus.
Gary H LymanHutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of South Florida · USAllegheny Health Network · USBeaumont Hospital, Royal Oak · USBeaumont Hospital, Troy · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNational Cancer Institute · USNew York University · USOregon Health & Science University · USPrisma Health · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Cincinnati · USUniversity of Rochester · USUniversity of Utah · USUniversity of Washington · USYale University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Better understanding of the emergency care needs of patients with cancer will inform outpatient and emergency department (ED) management. Objective: To provide a benchmark description of patients who present to the ED with active cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter prospective cohort study included 18 EDs affiliated with the Comprehensive Oncologic Emergencies Research Network (CONCERN). Of 1564 eligible patients, 1075 adults with active cancer were included from February 1, 2016, through January 30, 2017. Data were analyzed from February 1 through August 1, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: The proportion of patients reporting symptoms (eg, pain, nausea) before and during the ED visit, ED and outpatient medications, most common diagnoses, and suspected infection as indicated by ED antibiotic administration. The proportions observed, admitted, and with a hospital length of stay (LOS) of no more than 2 days were identified. Results: Of 1075 participants, mean (SD) age was 62 (14) years, and 51.8% were female. Seven hundred ninety-four participants (73.9%; 95% CI, 71.1%-76.5%) had undergone cancer treatment in the preceding 30 days; 674 (62.7%; 95% CI, 59.7%-65.6%) had advanced or metastatic cancer; and 505 (47.0%; 95% CI, 43.9%-50.0%) were 65 years or older. The 5 most common ED diagnoses were symptom related. Of all participants, 82 (7.6%; 95% CI, 6.1%-9.4%) were placed in observation and 615 (57.2%; 95% CI, 54.2%-60.2%) were admitted; 154 of 615 admissions (25.0%; 95% CI, 21.7%-28.7%) had an LOS of 2 days or less (median, 3 days; interquartile range, 2-6 days). Pain during the ED visit was present in 668 patients (62.1%; 95% CI, 59.2%-65.0%; mean [SD] pain score, 6.4 [2.6] of 10.0) and in 776 (72.2%) during the prior week. Opioids were administered in the ED to 228 of 386 patients (59.1%; 95% CI, 18.8%-23.8%) with moderate to severe ED pain. Outpatient opioids were prescribed to 368 patients (47.4%; 95% CI, 3.14%-37.2%) of those with pre-ED pain, including 244 of 428 (57.0%; 95% CI, 52.2%-61.8%) who reported quite a bit or very much pain. Nausea in the ED was present in 336 (31.3%; 95% CI, 28.5%-34.1%); of these, 160 (47.6%; 95% CI, 12.8%-17.1%) received antiemetics in the ED. Antibiotics were administered in the ED to 285 patients (26.5%; 95% CI, 23.9%-29.2%). Of these, 209 patients (73.3%; 95% CI, 17.1%-21.9%) were admitted compared with 427 of 790 (54.1%; 95% CI, 50.5%-57.6%) not receiving antibiotics. Conclusions and Relevance: This initial prospective, multicenter study profiling patients with cancer who were treated in the ED identifies common characteristics in this patient population and suggests opportunities to optimize care before, during, and after the ED visit. Improvement requires collaboration between specialists and emergency physicians optimizing ED use, improving symptom control, avoiding unnecessary hospitalizations, and appropriately stratifying risk to ensure safe ED treatment and disposition of patients with cancer.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalNeoplasmsAgedCancer PainFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedNauseaProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID30901049
PMCPMC6583275
OpenAlexW2941488535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.