Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30901048›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2019

Evaluation of Machine-Learning Algorithms for Predicting Opioid Overdose Risk Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Opioid Prescriptions.

Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic, James L Huang, Hao H Zhang, Jeremy C Weiss, Yonghui Wu, C Kent Kwoh, Julie M Donohue, Gerald Cochran, Adam J Gordon, Daniel C Malone and 2 more

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 137 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
137citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
28.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06806163 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Machine-Learning Prediction and Reducing Overdoses With EHR Nudges

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2025 to 2027Enrolled1,350ConditionsOpioid Overdose, Opioid Use, Opioid Use Disorder, OpioidsArmsEHR-Embedded Elevated-Risk Flag, EHR-Embedded Elevated-Risk Flag with Behavioral Nudges, Usual Care
NCT06810076 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Developing and Evaluating a Machine-Learning Opioid Prediction & Risk-Stratification E-Platform (DEMONSTRATE)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2025 to 2026Enrolled674ConditionsOpiate Overdose, Opioid-Related Disorders, Narcotic-Related Disorders, Substance-related DisordersArmsMachine Learning-Based Clinical Decision Support: Overdose Prevention Alert (OPA) Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

137 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 224 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. A Guide to Constructing Indigenous Statistical Spaces for Prevention Science Research.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cultivating Authentic Partnership: Cooperative Development of a Toolkit to Mitigate Group Harm in Biorepository-Enabled Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  20. Opioid Overdose Death Prediction with Graph Neural Networks.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article

77 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Wei-Hsuan Lo-CiganicDepartment of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville.
James L HuangDepartment of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Hao H ZhangDepartment of Mathematics, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Jeremy C WeissCarnegie Mellon University, Heinz College, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Yonghui WuDepartment of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville.
C Kent KwohDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, and the University of Arizona Arthritis Center, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Julie M DonohueDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Gerald CochranProgram for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Adam J GordonProgram for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge, and Advocacy, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Daniel C MaloneDepartment of Pharmacy, Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Courtney C KuzaCenter for Pharmaceutical Policy and Prescribing, Health Policy Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Walid F GelladCenter for Pharmaceutical Policy and Prescribing, Health Policy Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
University of Arizona · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USCarnegie Mellon University · USUniversity of Utah · USVA Salt Lake City Healthcare System · US

Funding

Using Machine Learning to Predict Problematic Prescription Opioid Use and Opioid OverdoseR01DA044985 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Walid F. Gellad · 2017 to 2026
$5.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA044985
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Current approaches to identifying individuals at high risk for opioid overdose target many patients who are not truly at high risk. Objective: To develop and validate a machine-learning algorithm to predict opioid overdose risk among Medicare beneficiaries with at least 1 opioid prescription. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prognostic study was conducted between September 1, 2017, and December 31, 2018. Participants (n = 560 057) included fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries without cancer who filled 1 or more opioid prescriptions from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2015. Beneficiaries were randomly and equally divided into training, testing, and validation samples. Exposures: Potential predictors (n = 268), including sociodemographics, health status, patterns of opioid use, and practitioner-level and regional-level factors, were measured in 3-month windows, starting 3 months before initiating opioids until loss of follow-up or the end of observation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Opioid overdose episodes from inpatient and emergency department claims were identified. Multivariate logistic regression (MLR), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-type regression (LASSO), random forest (RF), gradient boosting machine (GBM), and deep neural network (DNN) were applied to predict overdose risk in the subsequent 3 months after initiation of treatment with prescription opioids. Prediction performance was assessed using the C statistic and other metrics (eg, sensitivity, specificity, and number needed to evaluate [NNE] to identify one overdose). The Youden index was used to identify the optimized threshold of predicted score that balanced sensitivity and specificity. Results: Beneficiaries in the training (n = 186 686), testing (n = 186 685), and validation (n = 186 686) samples had similar characteristics (mean [SD] age of 68.0 [14.5] years, and approximately 63% were female, 82% were white, 35% had disabilities, 41% were dual eligible, and 0.60% had at least 1 overdose episode). In the validation sample, the DNN (C statistic = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.88-0.93) and GBM (C statistic = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87-0.94) algorithms outperformed the LASSO (C statistic = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.80-0.89), RF (C statistic = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.75-0.84), and MLR (C statistic = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69-0.80) methods for predicting opioid overdose. At the optimized sensitivity and specificity, DNN had a sensitivity of 92.3%, specificity of 75.7%, NNE of 542, positive predictive value of 0.18%, and negative predictive value of 99.9%. The DNN classified patients into low-risk (76.2% [142 180] of the cohort), medium-risk (18.6% [34 579] of the cohort), and high-risk (5.2% [9747] of the cohort) subgroups, with only 1 in 10 000 in the low-risk subgroup having an overdose episode. More than 90% of overdose episodes occurred in the high-risk and medium-risk subgroups, although positive predictive values were low, given the rare overdose outcome. Conclusions and Relevance: Machine-learning algorithms appear to perform well for risk prediction and stratification of opioid overdose, especially in identifying low-risk subgroups that have minimal risk of overdose.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesics, OpioidCohort StudiesDrug OverdoseFemaleHumansMaleMedical Informatics ApplicationsMedicareMiddle AgedPrescriptionsRisk AssessmentUnited StatesAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID30901048
PMCPMC6583312
OpenAlexW2924338030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.