Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30900940›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2020

Preliminary investigation on feline coronavirus presence in the reproductive tract of the tom cat as a potential route of viral transmission.

Angelica Stranieri, Monica Probo, Maria C Pisu, Alberto Fioletti, Sara Meazzi, Maria E Gelain, Federico Bonsembiante, Stefania Lauzi, Saverio Paltrinieri

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Angelica StranieriDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8529-572X
Monica ProboDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7479-9869
Maria C PisuVeterinary Reference Centre, Turin, Italy.
Alberto FiolettiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Sara MeazziDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Maria E GelainDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padova, Legnaro, Padova, Italy.
Federico BonsembianteDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padova, Legnaro, Padova, Italy.
Stefania LauziDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Saverio PaltrinieriDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7117-7987
University of Milan · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesFeline infectious peritonitis (FIP) is an immune-mediated disease initiated by feline coronavirus (FCoV) infection. To date, the only proven route of transmission is the faecal-oral route, but a possible localisation of FCoV in the reproductive tract of tom cats is of concern, owing to the involvement of the male reproductive tract during FIP and to the presence of reproduction disorders in FCoV-endemic feline catteries. The aim of the study was to investigate the presence and localisation of FCoV in semen and/or in the reproductive tract of tom cats, and its possible association with seroconversion and viraemic phase.

methodsBlood, serum, semen and/or testicle samples were obtained from 46 tom cats. Serology was performed on 38 serum samples, nested reverse transcriptase PCR (nRT-PCR) and reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) were performed on 39 blood samples and on 17 semen samples, and histology, immunohistochemistry and nRT-PCR were performed on 39 testicles.

resultsTwenty-four of 38 serum samples were positive on serology. Semen samples were negative on RT-PCR and RT-qPCR for FCoV, while all blood samples were negative at both molecular methods, except for one sample positive at RT-qPCR with a very low viral load. All testicles were negative at immunohistochemistry, while six were positive at nRT-PCR for FCoV. Serology and blood PCR results suggest that the virus was present in the environment, stimulating transient seroconversion. FCoV seems not to localise in the semen of tom cats, making the venereal route as a way of transmission unlikely. Although viral RNA was found in some testicles, it could not be correlated with the viraemic phase. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In the light of these preliminary results, artificial insemination appears safer than natural mating as it eliminates the direct contact between animals, thus diminishing the probability of faecal-oral FCoV transmission.

Indexed as

Coronavirus, FelineFeline Infectious PeritonitisAnimalsCatsMaleRNA, ViralSemenTestisRNA, Viralcattery managementFeline coronavirusfeline infectious peritonitisPCRpreventiontom cat reproduction

Identifiers

PMID30900940
PMCPMC7221457
OpenAlexW2922594745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.