Evidence map›Paper›PMID 3090053›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology1986

Vinculin interaction with permeabilized cells: disruption and reconstitution of a binding site.

E H Ball, C Freitag, S Gurofsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 1986. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Force transduction by Triton cytoskeletons.The Journal of cell biology · 2002
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Isolation and contraction of the stress fiber.Molecular biology of the cell · 1998
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The structure and function of alpha-actinin.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 1989
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Interaction of the cytoskeleton with the plasma membrane.The Journal of membrane biology · 1987
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

E H Ball
C Freitag
S Gurofsky

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescently labeled vinculin binds to focal contact areas in permeabilized cells independent of actin (Avnur, Z., J. V. Small, and B. Geiger, 1983, J. Cell Biol., 96:1622-1630), but the nature of the binding site is unknown. In this study we have examined the interaction of vinculin with these sites in permeabilized L6 myoblasts to define conditions that perturb the binding and subsequently to reconstitute it. Mild treatment with low concentrations of protease prevents vinculin incorporation without gross changes in the cytoskeleton or extensive protein breakdown. Exposure to buffers of moderate ionic strength also reduces subsequent vinculin binding without large morphological effects. These extraction conditions were used to obtain a fraction from gizzard which was able to restore the vinculin localization. Talin, actin, and vinculin itself were able to alter the binding of labeled vinculin to permeabilized cells and each also interacted with vinculin in gel overlays; however, they were unable to reconstitute the binding site in treated permeabilized cells. The results show a requirement for an as yet unidentified protein to capacitate vinculin binding to focal contact sites and suggest that this protein is peripheral and interacts directly with the binding site.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesCell AdhesionCell LineCell Membrane PermeabilityChickensFluorescent Antibody TechniqueGizzard, AvianMiceMolecular WeightMuscle ProteinsMusclesProtein BindingVinculinMuscle ProteinsVinculin

Identifiers

PMID3090053
PMCPMC2113843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.