Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30900352›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2019

An 8-channel receive array for improved

Mark J van Uden, Tom H Peeters, Anne Rijpma, Christopher T Rodgers, Arend Heerschap, Tom W J Scheenen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. 3DNMR in biomedicine · 2021
    Article
  5. An 8-channel receive array for improvedMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mark J van UdenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Tom H PeetersDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Anne RijpmaDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Christopher T RodgersWolfson Brain Imaging Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1275-1197
Arend HeerschapDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Tom W J ScheenenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLErwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging · DEUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0700796Wellcome Trust 098436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo demonstrate a

methodsWe developed an 8-channel

resultsCompared to the birdcage coil alone, the

conclusionThe new coil configuration allows

Indexed as

AdultAlgorithmsBrainEquipment DesignFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhantoms, Imaging1H-decoupling31P MR spectroscopic imaging3 TeslabrainRF array coil

Identifiers

PMID30900352
PMCPMC6520216
OpenAlexW2924496911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.