ArticleBritish journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)2019
Breaking face processing tasks apart to improve their predictive value in the real world: A comment on Ramon, Bobak, and White (2019).
Article in British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating people's metacognitive insight into their own face abilities.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024Article
- When two fields collide: Identifying "super-recognisers" for neuropsychological and forensic face recognition research.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2021Review
- Towards a 'manifesto' for super-recognizer research.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this commentary, I will expand on three aspects suggested by Ramon et al. (2019, British Journal of Psychology, 110, 461) to improve the predictive value of laboratory-based tasks in real-world applications. There are potential benefits that may arise from three interrelated considerations, particularly in terms of predicting agents' susceptibility to errors in operational settings. The first is a proposal to conduct a detailed examination of performance on face processing tests rather than only analysing overall accuracy scores. The second involves considering non-face-related cognitive and meta-cognitive sub-processes involved in face processing tasks. The third highlights the contribution of superior recognisers in creating challenging tests that simulate difficult real-world situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30900243What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.