ArticleLa Radiologia medica2019
Overdiagnosis and overimaging: an ethical issue for radiological protection.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions to reduce low-value imaging - a systematic review of interventions and outcomes.BMC health services research · 2021Pooled it
- 'Challenges and opportunities for imaging on a global scale' special collection-introductory editorial.BJR open · 2026Article
- Foundation models and intelligent decision-making: Progress, challenges, and perspectives.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2025Review
- Rating the Efficacy of Diagnostic Imaging Studies Conducted for the Workup of Musculoskeletal Tumors.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Inappropriate requests for cranial CT scans in emergency departments increase overuse and reduce test performance.Emergency radiology · 2023Article
- Incidental Focal Spleen Lesions: Integrated Imaging and Pattern Recognition Approach to the Differential Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- An economic impact of incorrect referrals for MRI and CT scans: A retrospective analysis.Health science reports · 2023Article
- Partial Spinous Process Decompression in Baastrup's Disease: A Case Report and Literature Review.Cureus · 2023Article
- Prevalence of ground glass nodules in preschool children: a cross-sectional study.Translational pediatrics · 2022Article
- Clinical Application of Ultra-High-Frequency Ultrasound.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Physical Therapists Are Routinely Performing the Requisite Skills to Directly Refer for Musculoskeletal Imaging: An Observational Study.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2022Observational
- The value of referral information and assessment - a cross sectional study of radiographers' perceptions.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Current Standards for and Clinical Impact of Emergency Radiology in Major Trauma.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- CT diagnostic reference levels based on clinical indications: results of a large-scale European survey.European radiology · 2021Article
- Cardiac magnetic resonance in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies.La Radiologia medica · 2020Review
- Assessing and coping with the financial burden of computed tomography utilization in Limbe, Cameroon: a sequential explanatory mixed-methods study.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Preventing overuse of laboratory diagnostics: a case study into diagnosing anaemia in Dutch general practice.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020Article
- Head CT scan in emergency room: Is it still abused? Quantification and causes analysis of overprescription in an Italian Emergency Department.La Radiologia medica · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AIMS AND
objectivesThis study aimed to analyse the key factors that influence the overimaging using X-ray such as self-referral, defensive medicine and duplicate imaging studies and to emphasize the ethical problem that derives from it. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this study, we focused on the more frequent sources of overdiagnosis such as the total-body CT, proposed in the form of screening in both public and private sector, the choice of the most sensitive test for each pathology such as pulmonary embolism, ultrasound investigations mostly of the thyroid and of the prostate and MR examinations, especially of the musculoskeletal system.
resultsThe direct follow of overdiagnosis and overimaging is the increase in the risk of contrast media infusion, radiant damage, and costs in the worldwide healthcare system. The theme of the costs of overdiagnosis is strongly related to inappropriate or poorly appropriate imaging examination.
conclusionsWe underline the ethical imperatives of trust and right conduct, because the major ethical problems in radiology emerge in the justification of medical exposures of patients in the practice. A close cooperation and collaboration across all the physicians responsible for patient care in requiring imaging examination is also important, balancing possible ionizing radiation disadvantages and patient benefits in terms of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.