Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30900092›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2019

Primary vascular bone tumors in the spine: a challenge for pathologists and spine oncology surgeons.

Stefano Boriani, Riccardo Cecchinato, Alberto Righi, Stefano Bandiera, Angelo Paolo Dei Tos, Riccardo Ghermandi, Alessandro Gasbarrini

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stefano BorianiIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8426-9108
Riccardo CecchinatoIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milano, Italy. dott.cecchinato@gmail.com.
Alberto RighiUnit of Pathology, Rizzoli Institute, Bologna, Italy.
Stefano BandieraUnit of Oncologic and Degenerative Spine Surgery, Rizzoli Institute, Bologna, Italy.
Angelo Paolo Dei TosDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Genetics, Treviso General Hospital, Treviso, Italy.
Riccardo GhermandiUnit of Oncologic and Degenerative Spine Surgery, Rizzoli Institute, Bologna, Italy.
Alessandro GasbarriniUnit of Oncologic and Degenerative Spine Surgery, Rizzoli Institute, Bologna, Italy.
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · ITIstituto Ortopedico Galeazzi · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrimary vascular bone tumors of the spine represent a challenge for oncology surgeons, due to the need of planning a surgical strategy appropriate to the tumor behavior. But these tumors represent a challenge also for pathologists, as immunohistochemical and molecular analyses have recently refined the terminology.

methodsA cohort of 81 cases was retrospectively reviewed, targeting the evolution of diagnoses and the treatment-related outcome. Sixty-six cases (including one case originally diagnosed as chordoma) were diagnosed before 2011, and 15 were diagnosed and treated in the period 2011-2017. Fully documented outcome studies are available for 46 patients whose immunohistochemical and molecular analyses were available. The follow-up ranges from 6 months of the early patient death to 300 months of the longest disease-free survival.

resultsThe outcome was related not only to the treatment performed, but also to the evolution of diagnoses. The term Hemangioendothelioma that defined a benign aggressive (Enneking stage 3) tumor is now obsolete and replaced by the diagnosis of Epithelioid Hemangioma for benign aggressive tumor and Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma for low-grade malignant tumor. En bloc resection was appropriate for local control, but 2 out of 7 cases of epithelioid Hemangioendotheliomas died due to the spread of the disease None of the Hemangiomas recurred after intralesional excision with or without radiotherapy, or after vertebroplasty. Both cases of Angiosarcoma had a fast and lethal evolution.

conclusionsSurgeons must be aware of the evolution of terminology to decide the most appropriate treatment options. These slides can be retrieved from Electronic Supplementary Material.

Indexed as

AdultBone NeoplasmsCohort StudiesFemaleHemangioendothelioma, EpithelioidHemangiomaHemangiosarcomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSpinal NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedBone vascular tumorEn bloc resectionPathologySpineSurgery

Identifiers

PMID30900092
OpenAlexW2924531594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.