Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30900006›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2019

Microbe and host interaction in gastrointestinal homeostasis.

Rachael Horne, James St Pierre, Sufian Odeh, Michael Surette, Jane A Foster

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05345106 (Inter-relationships Among Iron Stores, the Gut Metagenome, Glucose Levels, and Different Cognitive Domains), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05345106 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Inter-relationships Among Iron Stores, the Gut Metagenome, Glucose Levels, and Different Cognitive Domains: the Role of Circulating MicroRNAs (IRONmiRNA Study).

TypeobservationalSponsorInstitut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona Dr. Josep TruetaRan2022 to 2027Enrolled138ConditionsObesityArmsBariatric Surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Fecal Microbiota Composition as a Metagenomic Biomarker of Dietary Intake.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Increase ofNutrients · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rachael HorneDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, 50 Charlton Ave. E, T3308, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada.
James St PierreDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, 50 Charlton Ave. E, T3308, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada.
Sufian OdehDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, 50 Charlton Ave. E, T3308, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada.
Michael SuretteDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Jane A FosterDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, 50 Charlton Ave. E, T3308, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada. jfoster@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8579-4705
St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton · CAPopulation Health Research Institute · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleResearchers in psychiatry and neuroscience are increasingly recognizing the importance of gut-brain communication in mental health. Both genetics and environmental factors influence gut microbiota composition and function. This study examines host-microbe signaling at the gastrointestinal barrier to identify bottom-up mechanisms of microbiota-brain communication.

objectivesWe examined differences in gut microbiota composition and fecal miRNA profiles in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice, in relation to gastrointestinal homeostasis and evaluated the response to perturbation of the gut microbiota by broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment. METHODS AND

resultsDifferences in the gut microbiota composition between BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice, evaluated by fecal 16S rRNA gene sequencing, included significant differences in genera Prevotella, Alistipes, Akkermansia, and Ruminococcus. Significant differences in fecal miRNA profiles were determined using the nCounter NanoString platform. A BLASTn analysis identified conserved fecal miRNA target regions in bacterial metagenomes with 14 significant correlations found between fecal miRNA and predicted taxa relative abundance in our dataset. Treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics for 2 weeks resulted in a host-specific physiological response at the gastrointestinal barrier including a decrease in barrier permeability in BALB/c mice and alterations in the expression of barrier regulating genes in both strains. Genera Parabacteroides and Bacteroides were associated with changes in barrier function.

conclusionsThe results of this study provide insight into how specific taxa influence gut barrier integrity and function. More generally, these data in the context of recent published studies makes a significant contribution to our understanding of host-microbe interactions providing new knowledge that can be harnessed by us and others in future mechanistic studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsFecesFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGastrointestinal TractHomeostasisHost Microbial InteractionsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSpecies SpecificityRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA gene sequencingAntibioticsGut barrier permeabilityGut-brain axisInbred strain

Identifiers

PMID30900006
PMCPMC6599184
OpenAlexW2925245599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.