Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30900005›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2019

Anatomic variations of the round window niche: radiological study and related endoscopic anatomy.

Pietro Canzi, Irene Avato, Marco Manfrin, Anna Maria Simoncelli, Marianna Magnetto, Elisabetta Rebecchi, Carmine Tinelli, Marinella Neri, Millo Achille Beltrame, Marco Benazzo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluating round window niche visibility in cochlear implantation: anatomical insights and electrode insertion strategies.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pietro Canzi *Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pavia, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy. pietro.canzi@unipv.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6471-5035
Irene Avato *Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pavia, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Marco ManfrinDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pavia, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Anna Maria SimoncelliDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University of Pavia, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Marianna MagnettoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pavia, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Elisabetta RebecchiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pavia, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Carmine TinelliBiometric Service, University of Pavia, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Marinella NeriDepartment of Radiology, Santa Maria del Carmine Hospital, Rovereto, Italy.
Millo Achille BeltrameDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pavia, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Marco BenazzoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pavia, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn the last decades, literature has shown an increasing interest in round windows (RW) anatomy due to its pivotal role in deafness surgery. The high variability of this anatomical region, with particular regard to the round windows niche (RWN), has been studied by several authors through different methods of investigation. The aim of the present research was to radiologically examine the morphological variability of the RWN and to link the imaging findings to the endoscopic view.

methodsHigh-resolution CT scans of 300 temporal bones without neuro-otological pathologies were retrospectively reviewed by 2 neuroradiologist and 1 ENT surgeon who independently evaluated the RWN morphological variations. To link the radiological to the endoscopic data, 45 cadaveric human temporal bones were submitted to a radiological evaluation and to an otoendoscopy conducted through a posterior tympanotomy approach.

resultsThree variants of the RWN were detected on coronal CT scan reconstructions: 155 "cylindrical-type", 97 "j-type" and 48 "truncated cone-type". For each radiological type the endoscopic findings showed a specific endoscopic position of the RW chamber, which results in different degrees of RW membrane visibility when analysed through a posterior tympanotomy approach.

conclusionsTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first description of the above-mentioned RWN radiological variations supported by endoscopic data. This study suggests an additional anatomical evaluation that could be useful to predict the RW membrane visibility through a posterior tympanotomy approach. Further studies are required to support the clinical implications of our observations.

Indexed as

Anatomic VariationDeafnessEndoscopyFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesRound Window, EarTomography, X-Ray ComputedAnatomic variationCochlear implantEndoscopic anatomyMiddle earRadiological anatomyRound window niche

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.