Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30899999›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2019

Spinal reciprocal inhibition in the co-contraction of the lower leg depends on muscle activity ratio.

Ryo Hirabayashi, Mutsuaki Edama, Sho Kojima, Wataru Ito, Emi Nakamura, Takanori Kikumoto, Hideaki Onishi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryo HirabayashiInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, 1398 Shimami-cho, Kita-ku, Niigata-shi, Niigata, 950-3198, Japan. hirabayashi@nuhw.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9698-9276
Mutsuaki EdamaInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, 1398 Shimami-cho, Kita-ku, Niigata-shi, Niigata, 950-3198, Japan.
Sho KojimaInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, 1398 Shimami-cho, Kita-ku, Niigata-shi, Niigata, 950-3198, Japan.
Wataru ItoInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, 1398 Shimami-cho, Kita-ku, Niigata-shi, Niigata, 950-3198, Japan.
Emi NakamuraInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, 1398 Shimami-cho, Kita-ku, Niigata-shi, Niigata, 950-3198, Japan.
Takanori KikumotoInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, 1398 Shimami-cho, Kita-ku, Niigata-shi, Niigata, 950-3198, Japan.
Hideaki OnishiInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, 1398 Shimami-cho, Kita-ku, Niigata-shi, Niigata, 950-3198, Japan.
Niigata University of Health and Welfare · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18K17769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spinal reciprocal inhibition during co-contraction remains unclear. Reports on the reciprocal Ia and D1 inhibitions in the co-contraction are lacking, and a point about the muscle activity amount during co-contraction is unclear. This study aimed to clarify the influence of changes in the ratio of soleus (Sol) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscle activities in co-contraction on reciprocal Ia and D1 inhibitions. Twenty healthy adults were subjected to four stimulatory conditions: a conditioning stimulus-test stimulation interval (CTI) of - 2, 2, or 20 ms or a test stimulus without a conditioning stimulus (single). Co-contraction [change in (Sol)/(TA) activity] was examined at task A, 0%/0% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC); task B, 5%/5% MVC; task C, 15%/15% MVC; task D, 5%/15% MVC; and task E, 15%/5% MVC. At 2-ms CTI, the H-reflex amplitude value was significantly lower in tasks A, B, C, and D than in the single condition. Among the tasks, the H-reflex amplitude values were lower for A, B, C, and D than for E. At 20-ms CTI, the H-reflex amplitude was significantly lower in tasks A, B, C, D, and E. Among the tasks, the H-reflex amplitude was significantly lower from task A and B to task E. The change in the muscle activity ratio during co-contraction could modulate reciprocal Ia inhibition depending on the Sol/TA muscle activity ratio. D1 inhibition at rest did not differ significantly when the Sol/TA ratio was equal or when TA muscle activity was high. During co-contraction with high Sol muscle activity, D1 inhibition decreased from rest.

Indexed as

AdultElectric StimulationElectromyographyFemaleH-ReflexHumansLegMaleMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalNeural InhibitionPeroneal NerveTibial NerveYoung AdultCo-contractionContraction intensityH-reflex amplitudeSpinal reciprocal inhibition

Identifiers

PMID30899999
OpenAlexW2923736428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.