Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30899989›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2019

A pharmacist-physician intervention model using a computerized alert system to reduce high-risk medication use in primary care.

Benoit Cossette, Ryeyan Taseen, Jacynthe Roy-Petit, Marie-Pier Villemure, Martine Grondin, Geneviève Ricard, François Goyer, Caroline Blanchard, Thomas Joly-Mischlich, Jean-François Éthier

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Prescription of Drug Ontology 2.0 (PDRO): More Than the Sum of Its Parts.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benoit CossetteFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada. bcossette.chus@ssss.gouv.qc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1765-9130
Ryeyan TaseenFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Jacynthe Roy-PetitCentre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Marie-Pier VillemureFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Martine GrondinCentre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Geneviève RicardFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
François GoyerFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Caroline BlanchardFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Thomas Joly-MischlichFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Jean-François ÉthierFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Université de Sherbrooke · CACentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePotentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) have been associated with a greater risk of adverse drug events and hospitalizations. To reduce PIMs use, a family health team (FHT) implemented a knowledge translation (KT) strategy that included a pharmacist-physician intervention model based on alerts from a computerized alert system (CAS).

methodsOur pragmatic, single-site, pilot study was conducted in an FHT clinic in Quebec, Canada. We included community-dwelling older adults (≥ 65 years), with at least 1 alert for selected PIMs and a medical appointment during the study period. PIMs were selected from the Beers and STOPP criteria. The primary outcome was PIMs cessation, decreased dose, or replacement. The secondary outcome was the clinical relevance of the alerts as assessed by the pharmacists.

resultsDuring the 134 days of the study, the CAS screened 369 individuals leading to the identification of 65 (18%) patients with at least 1 new alert. For those 65 patients, the mean age was 77 years, men accounted for 29% of the group and 55% were prescribed 10 or more drugs. One or more clinically relevant alerts were generated for 27 of 65 included patients for an overall clinical relevance of the alerts of 42%. Of the 27 patients with at least 1 relevant alert, 17 (63%) had at least 1 medication change as suggested by the pharmacist.

conclusionAn interdisciplinary pharmacist-physician intervention model, based on alerts generated by a CAS, reduced the use of PIMs in community-dwelling older adults followed by an FHT.

Indexed as

Potentially Inappropriate Medication ListAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInappropriate PrescribingMalePharmacistsPhysiciansPilot ProjectsPrimary Health CareQuebecComputerized alert systemKnowledge translationOlder adultsPotentially inappropriate medicationsPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID30899989
OpenAlexW2924012744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.