ArticleEuropean radiology2019
Early evaluation of tumor response to
Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic value ofClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021Article
- Interim response in diffuse large B cell lymphoma on CT: what is the optimal size reduction (ΔSPD) for predicting outcome?European radiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine the earliest optimal timing for assessment of early response following radioimmunotherapy in non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients using FDG-PET/CT.
methodsFDG-PET/CT was performed prior to treatment (PET1), at 2 (PET2) weeks, and at 6 (PET3) weeks after
resultsPET 2 showed complete metabolic response (CMR), partial metabolic response (PMR), stable metabolic disease (SMD), and progressive metabolic disease (PMD) in 33, 13, 6, and 3 patients, respectively, while PET 3 in 41, 8, 3, and 3 patients, respectively. Mean SUV
conclusionUse of FDG-PET/CT findings with Lugano criteria for assessing early response to radioimmunotherapy after 6 weeks allowed for accurate evaluation and prognostic stratification, though scanning after 2 weeks was too soon to precisely evaluate response. KEY POINTS: • The optimal timing of FDG-PET/CT to obtain a suitable tool for assessment of response after
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.