ArticleClinical neuroradiology2020
Neoplastic and Non-Neoplastic Causes of Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage on CT : The Diagnostic Value of Perihematomal Edema.
Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perilesional Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Differentiating Malignant and Benign Causes of Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Observational
- Intracerebral Hemorrhage as the Initial Manifestation of Brain Metastasis from Left Atrial Intimal Sarcoma in a Young Adult: A Case Report.NMC case report journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Detecting Tumor-Associated Intracranial Hemorrhage Using Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.Neurology international · 2024Review
- Clinical and imaging manifestations of intracerebral hemorrhage in brain tumors and metastatic lesions: a comprehensive overview.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2024Observational
- Should we be afraid of radiotherapy for hemorrhagic brain metastases? A narrative review.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024Review
- Manifestation of the malignant progression of glioma following initial intracerebral hemorrhage: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Article
- Multilesion Segmentations in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Reliability of ICH, IVH and PHE Masks.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of perihematomal edema (PHE) volume in non-enhanced computed tomography (NECT) to discriminate neoplastic and non-neoplastic causes of acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).
methodsIn this retrospective study, from 560 patients with acute ICH 91 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were classified into neoplastic and non-neoplastic ICH. For each patient, ICH and total hemorrhage volume (ICH + PHE) were segmented semiautomatically. The PHE volume and relative PHE were further calculated and all parameters were compared between the different groups. Additionally, hematoma density was measured and compared between the groups.
resultsThe PHE volume and relative PHE on NECT were significantly higher in neoplastic vs. the non-neoplastic ICH (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively). Absolute ICH volume, symptom time onset to CT and ICH localization showed no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.1). Univariate receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis revealed a high diagnostic performance for relative PHE in the discrimination of neoplastic and non-neoplastic ICH with an optimal cut-off of 0.50 (area under the curve, AUC 0.81, 60.0% sensitivity, 91.8% specificity), followed by PHE (AUC 0.69) and hematoma density (AUC 0.68).
conclusionRelative PHE with a cut-off of >0.50 is a specific and simple indicator for neoplastic causes of acute ICH and a potential tool for clinical implementation. This observation needs to be validated in an independent patient cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.