Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30899868›Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2019

Serum Creatinine in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.

Kate Wiles, Kate Bramham, Paul T Seed, Catherine Nelson-Piercy, Liz Lightstone, Lucy C Chappell

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07068022 (Development and Validation of an Obstetric Organ Dysfunction Score to Predict Mortality in Intensive Care Unit), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07068022 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Development and Validation of an Obstetric Organ Dysfunction Score to Predict Mortality in Intensive Care Unit: A Multicenter, Prospective, Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorDaniela VasquezRan2025 to 2027Enrolled130ConditionsPregnancy, Postpartum, Organ Dysfunction, Critical Care, Intensive CareArmsOrgan dysfunction score adjusted to obstetric patients (SOFA-OBS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparison of estimated glomerular filtration rate equations on prediction of mortality, kidney failure and acute kidney injury.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. NephroCheck AKI risk scores (TIMP-2 and IGFBP7) in pregnancy.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2025
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kate WilesDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.
Kate BramhamDepartment of Renal Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Paul T SeedDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.
Catherine Nelson-PiercyGuy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Liz LightstoneSection of Renal Medicine and Vascular Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Lucy C ChappellDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.
King's College London · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBImperial College London · GBKing's College Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-2014-05-019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStandard assessment of renal function in pregnancy is by measurement of serum creatinine concentration yet normal gestational ranges have not been established. The aim of this systematic review was to define the difference in serum creatinine in a healthy pregnancy compared with concentrations in nonpregnant women to facilitate identification of abnormal kidney function in pregnancy.

methodsMedline, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, theses, key obstetric texts, and conference proceedings were searched to July 2017. Eligible studies included quantification of serum creatinine concentration in a pregnant cohort, with either a reported local laboratory reference range or matched quantification in a nonpregnant cohort. The outcomes of interest were the mean and upper reference limits for creatinine in pregnancy, measured as a ratio of pregnant:nonpregnant values. Study heterogeneity was examined by meta-regression analysis.

resultsForty-nine studies were identified. Data synthesis included 4421 serum creatinine values in pregnancy, weighted according to cohort size. Mean values for serum creatinine in pregnancy were 84%, 77%, and 80% of nonpregnant mean values during the first, second, and third trimesters, respectively. The 97.5th centile (upper limit of the 95% reference range) for serum creatinine in pregnancy was 85%, 80%, and 86% of the nonpregnant upper limit in sequential trimesters.

conclusionBased on a nonpregnant reference interval of 45-90 μmol/l (0.51-1.02 mg/dl), a serum creatinine of >77 μmol/l (0.87 mg/dl) should be considered outside the normal range for pregnancy. Future work can use this value to explore correlation of adverse pregnancy outcomes with serum creatinine concentration. PROSPERO registration: CRD42017068446.

Indexed as

creatininekidney functionpregnancyrenal function

Identifiers

PMID30899868
PMCPMC6409397
OpenAlexW2899496120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.