Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30899777›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Neural Processing of Communication Signals: The Extent of Sender-Receiver Matching Varies across Species of

Kathryne M Allen, Gary Marsat

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Supervised learning algorithm for analysis of communication signals in the weakly electric fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Encoding and Perception of Electro-communication Signals inFrontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kathryne M AllenDepartment of Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505.ORCID 0000-0002-8548-3640
Gary MarsatDepartment of Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505.ORCID 0000-0001-5454-049X
West Virginia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As communication signal properties change, through genetic drift or selective pressure, the sensory systems that receive these signals must also adapt to maintain sensitivity and adaptability in an array of contexts. Shedding light on this process helps us to understand how sensory codes are tailored to specific tasks. In a species of weakly electric fish,

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsElectric FishLateral Line Systemcommunicationelectrosensoryinformationneural codingsensory tuning

Identifiers

PMID30899777
PMCPMC6426436
OpenAlexW2919595318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.