ArticleComputing in cardiology2018
A Common-Ground Review of the Potential for Machine Learning Approaches in Electrocardiographic Imaging Based on Probabilistic Graphical Models.
Article in Computing in cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Electrocardiographic imaging in the atria.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) methods have seen an explosion in their development and application. They are increasingly being used in many different fields with considerable success. However, although the interest is growing, their impact in the field of electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) remains limited. One of the main reasons that ML has yet to become more prevalent in ECGI is that the published literature is scattered and there is no common ground description and comparison of these methods in an ML framework. Here we address this limitation with a review of ECGI methods from the perspective of ML. We will use probabilistic modeling to provide a common ground framework to compare different methods and well known approaches. Finally, we will discuss which approaches have been used to do inference on these models and which alternatives could be utilized as the methods in ML become more mature.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.