Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30899556›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2018

e-PC101: an electronic clinical decision support tool developed in South Africa for primary care in low-income and middle-income countries.

Matthew Yau, Venessa Timmerman, Merrick Zwarenstein, Pat Mayers, Ruth Vania Cornick, Eric Bateman, Lara Fairall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Strengthening prehospital clinical practice guideline development in South Africa: Reflections from guideline experts.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthew YauUniversity of Toronto Medical School, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3555-1833
Venessa TimmermanKnowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.
Merrick ZwarensteinCentre for Studies in Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0162-7027
Pat MayersKnowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.
Ruth Vania CornickKnowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.
Eric BatemanKnowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.
Lara FairallKnowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health technology is increasingly recognised as a feasible method of addressing health needs in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Primary Care 101, now known as PACK (Practical Approach to Care Kit), is a printed, algorithmic, checklist-based, comprehensive clinical decision support tool. It assists clinicians with delivering evidence-based medicine for common primary care presentations and conditions. These assessment and treatment guides have been adopted widely in primary care clinics across South Africa. This paper focuses on the process of designing, developing, and implementing a digital version of the clinical decision support tool for use on a tablet computer. Lessons learnt throughout its development and pilot implementation could apply to the creation of electronic health interventions and the digitisation of clinical tools in LMICs.

Indexed as

Other diagnostic or toolpublic Health

Identifiers

PMID30899556
PMCPMC6407554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.