Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30899427›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2019

The value of arterial spin labelling in adults glioma grading: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Amirah Alsaedi, Fabio Doniselli, Hans Rolf Jäger, Jasmina Panovska-Griffiths, Antonio Rojas-Garcia, Xavier Golay, Sotirios Bisdas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Multiparametric simultaneous hybridQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Advanced MR Techniques for Preoperative Glioma Characterization: Part 1.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. CEST MRI provides amide/amine surrogate biomarkers for treatment-naïve glioma sub-typing.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amirah AlsaediDepartment of Radiology Technology, Taibah University, Medina, KSA.
Fabio DoniselliPostgraduate School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Hans Rolf JägerDepartment of Brain Repair & Rehabilitation, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Jasmina Panovska-GriffithsDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK.
Antonio Rojas-GarciaDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK.
Xavier GolayDepartment of Brain Repair & Rehabilitation, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Sotirios BisdasDepartment of Brain Repair & Rehabilitation, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of arterial spin labelling (ASL) in grading of adult gliomas. Eighteen studies matched the inclusion criteria and were included after systematic searches through EMBASE and MEDLINE databases. The quality of the included studies was assessed utilizing Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). The quantitative values were extracted and a meta-analysis was subsequently based on a random-effect model with forest plot and joint sensitivity and specificity modelling. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HROC) curve analysis was also conducted. The absolute tumour blood flow (TBF) values can differentiate high-grade gliomas (HGGs) from low-grade gliomas (LGGs) and grade II from grade IV tumours. However, it lacked the capacity to differentiate grade II from grade III tumours and grade III from grade IV tumours. In contrast, the relative TBF (rTBF) is effective in differentiating HGG from LGG and in glioma grading. The maximum rTBF (rTBFmax) demonstrated the best results in glioma grading. These results were also reflected in the sensitivity/specificity analysis in which the rTBFmax showed the highest discrimination performance in glioma grading. The estimated effect size for the rTBF was approximately similar between HGGs and LGGs, and grade II and grade III tumours, (-1.46 (-2.00, -0.91),

Indexed as

arterial spin labelinggliomagrading

Identifiers

PMID30899427
PMCPMC6422184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.