Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30899157›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of biological sciences2019

Veena Sunderam, Devasena Thiyagarajan, Ansel Vishal Lawrence, Sathak Sameer Shaik Mohammed, Arokiyaraj Selvaraj

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 160 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effect ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Heliyon · 2022
    Article
  18. Green Metallic Nanoparticles: Biosynthesis to Applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Veena SunderamCentre for Nano Science and Technology, A. C. Tech Campus, Anna University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Devasena ThiyagarajanCentre for Nano Science and Technology, A. C. Tech Campus, Anna University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ansel Vishal LawrenceDepartment of Biotechnology, Sree Sastha Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sathak Sameer Shaik MohammedDepartment of Biotechnology, Sree Sastha Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Arokiyaraj SelvarajDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, Sejong University, Republic of Korea.
Anna University, Chennai · INSejong University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aqueous cashew leaves extract obtained was investigated for the preparation of gold nanoparticle (AuNPs). The obtained AuNPs were characterized by UV-Visible spectroscopy, FTIR and XRD analysis. Results indicated that the green synthesized AuNPs showed good antibacterial effect against

Indexed as

Anacardium occidentaleAntibacterialCytotoxicityGreen synthesized gold nanoparticle

Identifiers

PMID30899157
PMCPMC6408713
OpenAlexW2902343698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.