ArticleScientific reports2019
Controlling Chaotic Resonance using External Feedback Signals in Neural Systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Churning Better Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Outcome with Accelerated Protocols: Understanding the Non-linear Dynamics through Metaplasticity.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025Review
- An adaptive approach to machine learning for compact particle accelerators.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- An Approach for Stabilizing Abnormal Neural Activity in ADHD Using Chaotic Resonance.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2021Article
- Transition of Neural Activity From the Chaotic Bipolar-Disorder State to the Periodic Healthy State Using External Feedback Signals.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2020Article
- Resonance phenomena controlled by external feedback signals and additive noise in neural systems.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stochastic resonance is a phenomenon in which the signal response of a non-linear system is enhanced by appropriate external noise. Likewise, a similar phenomenon can be caused by deterministic chaos; this is called chaotic resonance. Devices that employ stochastic resonance have been proposed for the purpose of enhancing tactile sensitivity. However, no applications of chaotic resonance have been reported so far, even though chaotic resonance exhibits a higher sensitivity than stochastic resonance. This contrast in applications could be attributed to the fact that chaotic resonance is induced by adjusting internal parameters. In many cases, especially in biological systems, these parameters are difficult to adjust. In this study, by applying our proposed reduced region of orbit method to a neural system consisting of excitatory and inhibitory neurons, we induce chaotic resonance with signal frequency dependency against weak input signals. Furthermore, the external noise exhibits effects for both diminishing and enhancing signal responses in chaotic resonance. The outcome of this study might facilitate the development of devices utilising the mechanism of chaotic resonance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.