Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30899000›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

A comprehensive, mechanistically detailed, and executable model of the cell division cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Ulrike Münzner, Edda Klipp, Marcus Krantz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Microbiome modeling: a beginner's guide.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ulrike MünznerHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Biology, Theoretical Biophysics, Berlin, 10099, Germany.
Edda KlippHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Biology, Theoretical Biophysics, Berlin, 10099, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0567-7075
Marcus KrantzHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Biology, Theoretical Biophysics, Berlin, 10099, Germany. marcus.krantz@rxncon.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how cellular functions emerge from the underlying molecular mechanisms is a key challenge in biology. This will require computational models, whose predictive power is expected to increase with coverage and precision of formulation. Genome-scale models revolutionised the metabolic field and made the first whole-cell model possible. However, the lack of genome-scale models of signalling networks blocks the development of eukaryotic whole-cell models. Here, we present a comprehensive mechanistic model of the molecular network that controls the cell division cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We use rxncon, the reaction-contingency language, to neutralise the scalability issues preventing formulation, visualisation and simulation of signalling networks at the genome-scale. We use parameter-free modelling to validate the network and to predict genotype-to-phenotype relationships down to residue resolution. This mechanistic genome-scale model offers a new perspective on eukaryotic cell cycle control, and opens up for similar models-and eventually whole-cell models-of human cells.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, FungalGenome, FungalModels, GeneticCell CycleCell Cycle ProteinsGene Regulatory NetworksGenetic Association StudiesMetabolic Networks and PathwaysProgramming LanguagesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSignal TransductionSystems BiologyCell Cycle ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30899000
PMCPMC6428898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.