Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30898944›Full record

ArticleBMJ case reports2019

Recurrence of a complex anterior skull base tumour managed with an uncommon surgical approach.

Muhammad Ibaad Ur Rehman Alvi, Omar Pathmanaban, Raj Bhalla, Navin Mani

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ case reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muhammad Ibaad Ur Rehman AlviManchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.
Omar PathmanabanManchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.
Raj BhallaManchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.
Navin ManiManchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A well 74 -year-old woman presented to routine ophthalmology clinic instituted following treatment of a frontoethmoidal sarcoma initially excised in 1989 and diagnosed then as a sinus mucosal melanoma. At review in ophthalmology clinic, a reduction in right visual fields was noted. CT scan showed recurrence of a mass now involving the frontoethmoidal region, frontal sinus and abutting the cribiform plate. Endoscopic biopsy confirmed the recurrence as a low-grade biphenotypic sarcoma. This was discussed at the sarcoma multidisciplinary meeting. Using a three-dimensional printed model of the patients skull for planning, primary surgery with craniofacial resection combining intracranial and transfacial approaches with reconstruction was decided on. The implications of no treatment would be tumour involvement of the dura and brain as well as the right only-seeing eye. Craniofacial surgery would involve otolaryngolical, neurosurgical and maxillofacial multispecialty involvement and close teamwork. The goal was en bloc excision with negative surgical margins.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleFrontal SinusHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPlastic Surgery ProceduresSarcomaSkull Base NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray Computedcancer interventionhead and neck cancerotolaryngology/Ent

Identifiers

PMID30898944
PMCPMC6453266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.