Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30898832›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Prelegalisation patterns and trends of cannabis use among Canadian youth: results from the COMPASS prospective cohort study.

Alexandra M E Zuckermann, Katelyn Battista, Margaret de Groh, Ying Jiang, Scott T Leatherdale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Disciplinary Approaches for Cannabis Use Policy Violations in Canadian Secondary Schools.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cannabis cessation among youth: rates, patterns and academic outcomes in a large prospective cohort of Canadian high school students.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexandra M E ZuckermannApplied Research Division, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0242-8815
Katelyn BattistaSchool of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Margaret de GrohApplied Research Division, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ying JiangApplied Research Division, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Scott T LeatherdaleSchool of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

CIHR MOP-114875CIHR OOP-110788
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCanada federally legalised recreational cannabis use among adults in October 2018. The impact this will have on Canadian youth is cause for concern. The current study examined changes in youth cannabis use over the time prior to legalisation to explore the impact of the beginning federal discourse around legalisation during the 2016/2017 school year.

designCOMPASS, a prospective cohort study based on annual self-administered questionnaires.

settingOntario and Alberta during the first 6 years of the COMPASS study (2012/2013 to 2017/2018).

participantsCanadian grade 9-12 students attending secondary schools participating in COMPASS. In total, 2 30 404 questionnaires were included in the analysis (Y1: 2012/2013, n=24 173; Y2: 2013/2014, n=45 298; Y3: 2014/2015, n=42 355, Y4: 2015/2016, n=40 436; Y5: 2016/2017, n=37 060; Y6: 2017/2018, n=34 897). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Lifetime cannabis use, past-year cannabis use, weekly cannabis use, ease of access to cannabis and age at first cannabis use.

resultsCannabis never-use decreased between Y5 and Y6. Changes in age at first cannabis use mirrored this trend, with male students consistently starting younger. Cannabis access rates increased from Y4, mainly led by female students. Lifetime and past-year use rates were lowest in Y4 then increased in Y5 and Y6 due to a rise in the occasional use more common among female students, who reported use increases first. Non-white students were more likely use cannabis, with black and Aboriginal students the only two groups consistently reporting more weekly than occasional use, though with opposing trajectories. Overall, Aboriginal students had the highest odds of reporting lifetime, past-year and weekly use among the demographic groups examined.

conclusionAfter a steady decrease in patterns of cannabis among youth over several years, it appears that there has been a gradual increase in cannabis use among youth following the start of discourse around cannabis legalisation, with some populations of youth being at greater risk.

Indexed as

AdolescentAlbertaChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMarijuana SmokingOntarioProspective StudiesSchoolsStudentsepidemiologypublic healthsubstance misuse

Identifiers

PMID30898832
PMCPMC6475172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.