Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30898823›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Self-management and blood pressure control in China: a community-based multicentre cross-sectional study.

Zhan Qu, Monica Parry, Fang Liu, Xiulin Wen, Jieqiong Li, Yanan Zhang, Duolao Wang, Xiaomei Li

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Understanding perspectives on health-promoting behaviours among older adults with hypertension.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhan QuSchool of Nursing, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7920-3016
Monica ParryLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6941-1380
Fang LiuSchool of Nursing, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Xiulin WenThe First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Jieqiong LiThe First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Yanan ZhangSchool of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Duolao WangDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Xiaomei LiSchool of Nursing, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study explored the relationship between self-management and blood pressure (BP) control in China.

designA cross-sectional study.

settingEight community health centres from four cities in the Northeast (Shenyang), Northwest (Xi'an), Southwest (Chengdu) and South (Changsha) of China.

participantsA total of 873 adults with hypertension, including 360 men and 513 women. Hypertension was defined as systolic BP ≥140 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP ≥90 mm Hg. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: BP control was the primary outcome variable. This was categorised as good control if individuals with hypertension reduced their BP to <140/90 mm Hg, otherwise, it was categorised as poor control. Secondary outcomes included self-management, defined as: (1) context or condition-specific factors or physical/social environments (eg, age, sex, marital status, education, personal income and health insurance) and (2) process or knowledge/beliefs, self-regulation skills/abilities and social facilitation (eg, treatment, diet, exercise and risk factor management). Data were analysed using logistic regression models using SPSS V.20.

resultsA total of 67.1% (n=586) participants had poor BP control. Limited outpatient care benefits in mainly rural residents (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.06 to 4.81) and longer disease duration (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.04) were associated with poor BP control. Self-management practices reduced the odds of having poor BP control (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97 to 0.99).

conclusionsThe individual and family self-management theory can serve as an effective theory for understanding the key contexts, processes and outcomes essential for BP control in China. Future research should evaluate the effect of a self-management intervention (eg, self-monitoring, medication adherence, regular and routine doctor visits, and social supports) for BP control in China using a multisite cluster randomised controlled trial. Sex and gender difference, cost and patient-reported outcomes should also be examined.

Indexed as

AgedBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansHypertensionLife StyleLogistic ModelsMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedSelf-Managementcommunity caregenderhypertensionself-managementsex

Identifiers

PMID30898823
PMCPMC6528047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.