Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30898821›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Hydroxychloroquine for prevention of recurrent miscarriage: study protocol for a multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial BBQ study.

Elisabeth Pasquier, Luc de Saint-Martin, Gisèle Marhic, Celine Chauleur, Caroline Bohec, Florence Bretelle, Véronique Lejeune-Saada, Jacob Hannigsberg, Geneviève Plu-Bureau, Virginie Cogulet and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabeth PasquierEA 3878, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France.
Luc de Saint-MartinEA 3878 Groupe d'Etude de la Thrombose de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.
Gisèle MarhicCentre d'Investigation Clinique-INSERM 1412, Brest, France.
Celine ChauleurThrombosis Research Group, University Hospital Bellevue, Saint-Etienne, France.
Caroline BohecDivision of Gynaecology, Hôpital François Mitterand, Pau, France.
Florence BretelleDivision of Gynaecology, Université de la Méditerranée, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France.
Véronique Lejeune-SaadaDivision of Gynaecology, Hôpital d'Auch, Auch, France.
Jacob HannigsbergDivision of Gynecology, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France.
Geneviève Plu-BureauDivision of Gynaecology, APHP, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.
Virginie CoguletDepartment of Pharmacy, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France.
Philippe MervielDivision of Gynecology, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France.
Dominique MottierBrest University Hospital, Brest, France.
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest · FRUniversité de Bretagne Occidentale · FRHôpital Cochin · FRHôpital Foch · FRInserm · FRUnité de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Emergentes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRecurrent miscarriage (RM), defined by three or more consecutive losses during the first trimester of pregnancy, affects 1%-2% of fertile couples. Standard investigations fail to reveal any apparent cause in ~50% of couples. However, on the basis of animal models and clinical studies, several hypotheses have been put forward concerning underlying mechanisms of RM: altered ovarian reserve, progesterone defect, thrombotic and/or endothelial dysfunction and immunological disturbances. Nonetheless, no study has yet reached conclusive beneficial clinical evidence for a potential treatment in unexplained RM. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a molecule with extensive safety data during pregnancy. The pharmacological properties of HCQ (eg, antithrombotic, vascular protective, immunomodulatory, improved glucose tolerance, lipidlowering and anti-infectious) could be effective against some mechanisms of unexplained RM. Furthermore, eventhough clinical benefit of HCQ is suggested in prevention of thrombotic and late obstetric events in antiphospholipid (APL) syndrome, there are no data suggesting the benefit of HCQ in RM in the presence of APL antibodies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Taken all together and given the low cost of HCQ, the aim of this multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study is to investigate whether HCQ would improve the live birth rate in women with RM, irrespective of maternal thrombophilic status: (1) no known thrombophilia, (2) inherited thrombophilia or (3) APL antibodies. The primary end point is a live and viable birth. After confirming eligibility and obtaining consent, 300 non-pregnant women will be randomised into two parallel groups for a daily oral treatment (HCQ 400 mg or placebo), initiated before conception and stopped at 10 weeks' gestation. If pregnancy does not occur after 1 year, the treatment will be stopped. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Agreement from the French National Public Health and Drug Security Agency (160765A-22) and ethical approval from the Committee for the Protection of Persons of NORD-OUEST I (2016-001330-97) have been obtained. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT0316513; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Abortion, HabitualAdministration, OralDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFranceGestational AgeHumansHydroxychloroquineLive BirthMulticenter Studies as TopicPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnancy Trimester, FirstRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicHydroxychloroquineclinical trialsinternal medicinesubfertility

Identifiers

PMID30898821
PMCPMC6527997
OpenAlexW2925197848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.