ArticleBMJ open2019
Opinion leader empowered patients about the era of digital health: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Care in the era of digital health: experiences from Norwegian general practitioners.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2025Article
- The Evolution of Patient Empowerment and Its Impact on Health Care's Future.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Enhancing doctor-patient relationships in community health care institutions: the Patient Oriented Four Habits Model (POFHM) trial-a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial protocol.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- Review
- COVID-19's Impact on Digital Health Adoption: The Growing Gap Between a Technological and a Cultural Transformation.JMIR human factors · 2022Article
- Public Engagement and Neurology: An Update.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- Article
- Communication on drug safety-related matters to patients: is it even more significant in this digital era?Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2020Article
- The Real Era of the Art of Medicine Begins with Artificial Intelligence.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe aimed to explore the opinion leader empowered patients' relationship with their medical professionals, their experiences and beliefs about technologies, and how they see the future. We also attempted to determine whether technologies, the access to it or patient empowerment are the main driving forces behind these changes.
designA qualitative interview study analysed with interpretative phenomenological analysis.
settingAll interviews were conducted and recorded individually with the same trained interviewer via a Skype call.
participantsThe study is based on qualitative, semistructured interviews with 11 opinion leader empowered patients from six countries including UK, USA, Australia, Sweden, South Africa and Ireland.
resultsWe identified four superordinate themes emerging from e-patients' experiences: (1) impact of technology, (2) the meaning of empowerment, (3) the changing physician-patient relationship and (4) expectations for the future. The relationship e-patients have with their physicians is based on efficient communication, proactivity, the desire for asking questions and the use of technologies. The interviews have shown that the rapid development of technology has fundamentally changed the lives of these e-patients, and technology eventually is transforming the physician-patient relationship into a partnership. Regarding the future of the physician-patient partnership, e-patients emphasised that change will rather be cultural than technological.
conclusionsThe interviews have shown that cooperation between technology and healthcare is not enough on its own: the most decisive factor is the return of the human touch and reciprocal communication. All of these suggest that technology is an important ally in the 'renaissance of medicine' that starts to treat patients as it should have always had.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.