Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30898685›Full record

ReviewMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2019

Single-molecule approach for studying RNAP II transcription initiation using magnetic tweezers.

Eric J Tomko, Eric A Galburt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric J TomkoBiochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, United States.
Eric A GalburtBiochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, United States. Electronic address: egalburt@wustl.edu.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

MECHANISMS OF EUKARYOTIC TRANSCRIPTION INITIATIONR01GM120559 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GALBURT, ERIC A · 2016 to 2019
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120559
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The initiation of transcription underlies the ability of cells to modulate genome expression as a function of both internal and external signals and the core process of initiation has features that are shared across all domains of life. Specifically, initiation can be sub-divided into promoter recognition, promoter opening, and promoter escape. However, the molecular players and mechanisms used are significantly different in Eukaryotes and Bacteria. In particular, bacterial initiation requires only the formation of RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme and proceeds as a series of spontaneous conformational changes while eukaryotic initiation requires the formation of the 31-subunit pre-initiation complex (PIC) and often requires ATP hydrolysis by the Ssl2/XPB subunit of the general transcription factor TFIIH. Our mechanistic view of this process in Eukaryotes has recently been improved through a combination of structural and single-molecule approaches which are providing a detailed picture of the structural dynamics that lead to the production of an elongation competent RNAP II and thus, an RNA transcript. Here we provide the methodological details of our single-molecule magnetic tweezers studies of transcription initiation using purified factors from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Indexed as

MagnetsTranscription Initiation, GeneticDNAEukaryotaNucleic Acid ConformationRNA Polymerase IISaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSingle Molecule ImagingDNARNA Polymerase IISaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30898685
PMCPMC6589114
OpenAlexW2920831401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.