Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30898550›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Neurology2019

Deferoxamine mesylate in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage (i-DEF): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 trial.

Magdy Selim, Lydia D Foster, Claudia S Moy, Guohua Xi, Michael D Hill, Lewis B Morgenstern, Steven M Greenberg, Michael L James, Vineeta Singh, Wayne M Clark and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02175225 (Study of Deferoxamine Mesylate in Intracerebral Hemorrhage), which is not on this map. Cited by 149 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
149citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
19.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02175225 phase2completednot on this map

Study of Deferoxamine Mesylate in Intracerebral Hemorrhage

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterRan2014 to 2018Enrolled294ConditionsIntracerebral HemorrhageArmsDeferoxamine Mesylate, Placebo (for Deferoxamine Mesylate)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

149 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 242 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy of desferrioxamine mesylate in intracerebral hematoma: a systemic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Iron chelators for acute stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Early neurological improvement with deferoxamine after intracerebral hemorrhage: A post hoc analysis of the i-DEF trial.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2025
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

89 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Magdy SelimBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: mselim@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Lydia D FosterDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Claudia S MoyNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Guohua XiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Michael D HillHealth Science Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Lewis B MorgensternDepartment of Neurology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Steven M GreenbergHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael L JamesDepartment of Anesthesiology and Neurology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Vineeta SinghSan Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Wayne M ClarkOregon Health and Science University Hospital, Portland, OR, USA.
Casey NortonBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Yuko Y PaleschDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Sharon D YeattsDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
i-DEF Investigators
Duke University · USMedical University of South Carolina · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USHarvard University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · USOregon Health and Science University Hospital · USSan Francisco General Hospital · USUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

Futility Study of Deferoxamine Mesylate in Intracerebral Hemorrhage (i-DEF)U01NS074425 · NINDS · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SELIM, MAGDY H · 2012 to 2016
$8.7M
NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS074425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIron from haemolysed blood is implicated in secondary injury after intracerebral haemorrhage. We aimed to assess the safety of the iron chelator deferoxamine mesylate in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage and to establish whether the drug merits investigation in a phase 3 trial.

methodsWe did a multicentre, futility-design, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 2 trial at 40 hospitals in Canada and the USA. Adults aged 18-80 years with primary, spontaneous, supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive deferoxamine mesylate (32 mg/kg per day) or placebo (saline) infusions for 3 consecutive days within 24 h of haemorrhage onset. Randomisation was done via a web-based trial-management system centrally in real time, and treatment allocation was concealed from both participants and investigators. The primary outcome was good clinical outcome, which was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 at day 90. We did a futility analysis: if the 90% upper confidence bound of the absolute risk difference between the two groups in the proportion of participants with a good clinical outcome was less than 12% in favour of deferoxamine mesylate, then to move to a phase 3 efficacy trial would be futile. Primary outcome and safety data were analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population, comprising only participants in whom the study infusions were initiated. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02175225, and is completed.

findingsWe recruited 294 participants between Nov 23, 2014, and Nov 10, 2017. The modified intention-to-treat population consisted of 144 patients assigned to the deferoxamine mesylate group and 147 assigned to the placebo group. At day 90, among patients with available data for the primary outcome, 48 (34%) of 140 participants in the deferoxamine mesylate group, and 47 (33%) of 143 patients in the placebo group, had modified Rankin Scale scores of 0-2 (adjusted absolute risk difference 0·6% [90% upper confidence bound 6·8%]). By day 90, 70 serious adverse events were reported in 39 (27%) of 144 patients in the deferoxamine mesylate group, and 78 serious adverse events were reported in 49 (33%) of 147 patients in the placebo group. Ten (7%) participants in the deferoxamine mesylate and 11 (7%) in the placebo group died. None of the deaths were judged to be treatment related.

interpretationDeferoxamine mesylate was safe. However, the primary result showed that further study of the efficacy of deferoxamine mesylate with anticipation that the drug would significantly improve the chance of good clinical outcome (ie, mRS score of 0-2) at day 90 would be futile.

fundingUS National Institutes of Health and US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.

Indexed as

AgedCerebral HemorrhageDeferoxamineDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousIron Chelating AgentsMaleMedical FutilityMiddle AgedNegative ResultsProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeDeferoxamineIron Chelating Agents

Identifiers

PMID30898550
PMCPMC6494117
OpenAlexW2921259698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.