Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30898165›Full record

ArticleBMC structural biology2019

QRNAS: software tool for refinement of nucleic acid structures.

Juliusz Stasiewicz, Sunandan Mukherjee, Chandran Nithin, Janusz M Bujnicki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC structural biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Generative AI for computational chemistry: A roadmap to predicting emergent phenomena.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juliusz StasiewiczLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Protein Engineering, International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, 02-109, Warsaw, Poland.
Sunandan MukherjeeLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Protein Engineering, International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, 02-109, Warsaw, Poland.
Chandran NithinLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Protein Engineering, International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, 02-109, Warsaw, Poland.
Janusz M BujnickiLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Protein Engineering, International Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, 02-109, Warsaw, Poland. iamb@genesilico.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComputational models of RNA 3D structure often present various inaccuracies caused by simplifications used in structure prediction methods, such as template-based modeling or coarse-grained simulations. To obtain a high-quality model, the preliminary RNA structural model needs to be refined, taking into account atomic interactions. The goal of the refinement is not only to improve the local quality of the model but to bring it globally closer to the true structure.

resultsWe present QRNAS, a software tool for fine-grained refinement of nucleic acid structures, which is an extension of the AMBER simulation method with additional restraints. QRNAS is capable of handling RNA, DNA, chimeras, and hybrids thereof, and enables modeling of nucleic acids containing modified residues.

conclusionsWe demonstrate the ability of QRNAS to improve the quality of models generated with different methods. QRNAS was able to improve MolProbity scores of NMR structures, as well as of computational models generated in the course of the RNA-Puzzles experiment. The overall geometry improvement may be associated with increased model accuracy, especially on the level of correctly modeled base-pairs, but the systematic improvement of root mean square deviation to the reference structure should not be expected. The method has been integrated into a computational modeling workflow, enabling improved RNA 3D structure prediction.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDNAHydrogen BondingModels, MolecularNucleic Acid ConformationRNASoftwareDNARNA3D structureAMBER force fieldDNAMolecular modelingRNASoftwareStructure refinement

Identifiers

PMID30898165
PMCPMC6429776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.