Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30898142›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2019

Melissa: Bayesian clustering and imputation of single-cell methylomes.

Chantriolnt-Andreas Kapourani, Guido Sanguinetti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Computational Methods for Single-cell DNA Methylome Analysis.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2023
    Review
  18. Methylome Imputation by Methylation Patterns.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chantriolnt-Andreas KapouraniSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AB, UK. C.A.Kapourani@ed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2303-1953
Guido SanguinettiSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9AB, UK. G.Sanguinetti@ed.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council Core grant to the MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular MedicineMedical Research Council MC_UU_00009/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00009/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measurements of single-cell methylation are revolutionizing our understanding of epigenetic control of gene expression, yet the intrinsic data sparsity limits the scope for quantitative analysis of such data. Here, we introduce Melissa (MEthyLation Inference for Single cell Analysis), a Bayesian hierarchical method to cluster cells based on local methylation patterns, discovering patterns of epigenetic variability between cells. The clustering also acts as an effective regularization for data imputation on unassayed CpG sites, enabling transfer of information between individual cells. We show both on simulated and real data sets that Melissa provides accurate and biologically meaningful clusterings and state-of-the-art imputation performance.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremDNA MethylationModels, StatisticalAlgorithmsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationCpG IslandsEmbryonic Stem CellsHumansModels, GeneticSingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID30898142
PMCPMC6427844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.