ArticleBMC microbiology2019
Isothermal microcalorimetry for thermal viable count of microorganisms in pure cultures and stabilized formulations.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigating the Effect of Ginger-Derived Nanovesicles on the Growth and Metabolic Activity ofJournal of extracellular biology · 2026Article
- Novel lytic phages improve the antibiofilm activity of dalbavancin, daptomycin, and fosfomycin against vancomycin-resistant enterococci.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Efficacy of a commercial bacteriophage cocktail against planktonic cells and both thin and thick biofilms of skin pathogens, measured using isothermal microcalorimetry.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Proof of concept: real-time viability and metabolic profiling of probiotics with isothermal microcalorimetry.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Detection and Drug Susceptibility Testing ofMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Assessing Viability and Stress Tolerance of Probiotics-A Review.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuantification of viable microorganisms is an important step in microbiological research as well as in microbial product formulation to develop biological control products or probiotics. Often, the efficiency of the resulting product is dependent on the microbial cell density and their viability, which may decrease over time. Commonly, the number of viable cells is determined by serial dilution and plating techniques or flow cytometry. In 2017, we developed a mathematical model for isothermal microcalorimetry (IMC) data analysis and showed that the new method allows for a more rapid quantification of viable fresh and freeze-dried anaerobic Lactobacillus reuteri cells than traditional viable count methods.
resultsThis study developed the new method further by applying it to well-known aerophilic plant-beneficial microbial species (Pseudomonas brassicacearum, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum and Clonostachys rosea) used in biological control products. We utilized IMC to quantify viable cells in microbial pure cultures as well as when coated onto wheat seeds. The results from this study confirmed that thermal viable count methods are more rapid and sensitive than traditional viable count techniques. Most interestingly, a thermal viable count method was able to quantify microbes coated on seeds despite the presence of the natural microbiota of the seeds. Our results also showed that, in contrast to plating techniques for which clustered cells skew the results, IMC does not require single cells for accurate viable counts.
conclusionsThermal viable count methods are novel methods for the rapid quantification of divergent bacterial and fungal species and enhance the speed, sensitivity, and accuracy of routine viable counts of pure cultures and controlled microbiomes such as plant seed coatings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.