Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30897838›Full record

ReviewGenes2019

Challenges in the Integration of Omics and Non-Omics Data.

Evangelina López de Maturana, Lola Alonso, Pablo Alarcón, Isabel Adoración Martín-Antoniano, Silvia Pineda, Lucas Piorno, M Luz Calle, Núria Malats

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Evangelina López de MaturanaGenetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), and CIBERONC, Melchor Fernández Almagro 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain. melopezdm@cnio.es.
Lola AlonsoGenetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), and CIBERONC, Melchor Fernández Almagro 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain. lalonso@cnio.es.
Pablo AlarcónGenetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), and CIBERONC, Melchor Fernández Almagro 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain. pabloalarconmoreno@gmail.com.
Isabel Adoración Martín-AntonianoGenetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), and CIBERONC, Melchor Fernández Almagro 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain. iamartin@ceu.es.
Silvia PinedaGenetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), and CIBERONC, Melchor Fernández Almagro 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain. spineda@ext.cnio.es.
Lucas PiornoGenetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), and CIBERONC, Melchor Fernández Almagro 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain. lucasp01012002@gmail.com.
M Luz CalleBiosciences Department, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia, Carrer de la Laura 13, 08570 Vic, Spain. malu.calle@uvic.cat.
Núria MalatsGenetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), and CIBERONC, Melchor Fernández Almagro 3, 28029 Madrid, Spain. nmalats@cnio.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Omics data integration is already a reality. However, few omics-based algorithms show enough predictive ability to be implemented into clinics or public health domains. Clinical/epidemiological data tend to explain most of the variation of health-related traits, and its joint modeling with omics data is crucial to increase the algorithm's predictive ability. Only a small number of published studies performed a "real" integration of omics and non-omics (OnO) data, mainly to predict cancer outcomes. Challenges in OnO data integration regard the nature and heterogeneity of non-omics data, the possibility of integrating large-scale non-omics data with high-throughput omics data, the relationship between OnO data (i.e., ascertainment bias), the presence of interactions, the fairness of the models, and the presence of subphenotypes. These challenges demand the development and application of new analysis strategies to integrate OnO data. In this contribution we discuss different attempts of OnO data integration in clinical and epidemiological studies. Most of the reviewed papers considered only one type of omics data set, mainly RNA expression data. All selected papers incorporated non-omics data in a low-dimensionality fashion. The integrative strategies used in the identified papers adopted three modeling methods: Independent, conditional, and joint modeling. This review presents, discusses, and proposes integrative analytical strategies towards OnO data integration.

Indexed as

Quantitative Trait LociAlgorithmsComputational BiologyGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenomicsHumansModels, GeneticPrognosisSequence Analysis, RNAchallengesclinical datadata integrationepidemiological datagenomicsintegrative analyticsjoint modelingnon-omics dataomics dataRNA expression

Identifiers

PMID30897838
PMCPMC6471713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.