Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30897759›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2019

A Mini-Review on Ceftaroline in Bacteremia Patients with Methicillin-Resistant

Nicole Lounsbury, Mary G Reeber, Georges Mina, Christiane Chbib

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Occurrence of multidrug-resistant methicillin-resistantInternational journal of veterinary science and medicine · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole LounsburyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Larkin University College of Pharmacy, 18301 North Miami Ave, Miami, FL 33169, USA. nlounsbury@ularkin.org.
Mary G ReeberDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Larkin University College of Pharmacy, 18301 North Miami Ave, Miami, FL 33169, USA. mreeber@myularkin.org.
Georges MinaPharmacy department, Jackson Memorial Hospital, 1611 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA. bicnu@hotmail.com.
Christiane ChbibDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Larkin University College of Pharmacy, 18301 North Miami Ave, Miami, FL 33169, USA. cchbib@ularkin.org.ORCID 0000-0002-7995-7803
Larkin University · USJackson Memorial Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this review is to describe the outcomes of patients treated with ceftaroline in the non-Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved indication of methicillin-resistant DATA SOURCES: A systematic overview was conducted by searching PubMed, Medline, and The Cochrane Library up to January 2019. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All English-language clinical trials and case reports related to the efficacy of ceftaroline in new, not-yet-approved FDA indications in MRSA infections in pediatric or adult populations. DATA SYNTHESIS: In the case of MRSA bacteremia (MRSAB) infections, three different randomized studies in pediatric patients showed effectiveness of ceftaroline. When used in the case of adult populations with MRSA bacteremia, a small trial of 16 patients showed 50% clinical success in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections versus 63% clinical success in patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Another case series of six refractory case reports showed 50% clinical success of ceftaroline in patients with MRSA.

conclusionsAlthough there are few case reports and limited data to date, ceftaroline fosamil should continue to be studied as an alternative therapy in MRSA infections in both pediatric and adult populations. Clinical success rates of ceftaroline were, in most cases, considered high when treating patients with MRSA infection. More clinical trials need to be studied. In the specific case of MRSA bacteremia, the treatment options remain few and ceftaroline should be extensively studied for the salvage treatment of MRSAB.

Indexed as

bacteria infectionceftarolinecephalosporincommunity-acquired infectionmethicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)MRSA bacteremiapediatricspneumoniasafetyskin infection

Identifiers

PMID30897759
PMCPMC6466573
OpenAlexW2924106385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.