Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30897433›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2019

BOLD-fMRI activity informed by network variation of scalp EEG in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.

Yun Qin, Sisi Jiang, Qiqi Zhang, Li Dong, Xiaoyan Jia, Hui He, Yutong Yao, Huanghao Yang, Tao Zhang, Cheng Luo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yun QinThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610054, China.
Sisi JiangThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610054, China.
Qiqi ZhangThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610054, China.
Li DongThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610054, China.
Xiaoyan JiaThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610054, China.
Hui HeThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610054, China.
Yutong YaoFaculty of natural science, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom.
Huanghao YangThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610054, China.
Tao ZhangThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610054, China. Electronic address: tao.zhang@alltechmed.com.
Cheng LuoThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610054, China. Electronic address: chengluo@uestc.edu.cn.
Dezhong YaoThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, High-Field Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610054, China. Electronic address: dyao@uestc.edu.cn.
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CNUniversity of Stirling · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epilepsy is marked by hypersynchronous bursts of neuronal activity, and seizures can propagate variably to any and all areas, leading to brain network dynamic organization. However, the relationship between the network characteristics of scalp EEG and blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) responses in epilepsy patients is still not well known. In this study, simultaneous EEG and fMRI data were acquired in 18 juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) patients. Then, the adapted directed transfer function (ADTF) values between EEG electrodes were calculated to define the time-varying network. The variation of network information flow within sliding windows was used as a temporal regressor in fMRI analysis to predict the BOLD response. To investigate the EEG-dependent functional coupling among the responding regions, modulatory interactions were analyzed for network variation of scalp EEG and BOLD time courses. The results showed that BOLD activations associated with high network variation were mainly located in the thalamus, cerebellum, precuneus, inferior temporal lobe and sensorimotor-related areas, including the middle cingulate cortex (MCC), supplemental motor area (SMA), and paracentral lobule. BOLD deactivations associated with medium network variation were found in the frontal, parietal, and occipital areas. In addition, modulatory interaction analysis demonstrated predominantly directional negative modulation effects among the thalamus, cerebellum, frontal and sensorimotor-related areas. This study described a novel method to link BOLD response with simultaneous functional network organization of scalp EEG. These findings suggested the validity of predicting epileptic activity using functional connectivity variation between electrodes. The functional coupling among the thalamus, frontal regions, cerebellum and sensorimotor-related regions may be characteristically involved in epilepsy generation and propagation, which provides new insight into the pathophysiological mechanisms and intervene targets for JME.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCerebellumCerebral CortexElectroencephalographyFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMyoclonic Epilepsy, JuvenileNerve NetScalpThalamusYoung AdultFunctional couplingJuvenile myoclonic epilepsyModulatory interactionNetwork variationSimultaneous EEG and fMRI

Identifiers

PMID30897433
PMCPMC6425117
OpenAlexW2921201789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.