ArticlePloS one2019
Genetic and epigenetic profiling of the infertile male.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fertility in the aging male: a systematic review.Fertility and sterility · 2022Pooled it
- Single-center thorough evaluation and targeted treatment of globozoospermic men.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Trial
- Induction of male neogametogenesis in a three-dimensional microenvironment supporting successful fertilization and proper embryo development.Molecular human reproduction · 2026Article
- Sperm Testing in Assisted Reproductive Technology: Diagnosis and Outcome Prediction.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026Review
- Switch-like gene expression modulates disease risk.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Risk Factors and a Gene Panel as a Tool for Unexplained Infertility Diagnosis by Next-Generation Sequencing.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- The intricate "ART" of ICSI.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Review
- Review
- Sperm DNA Fragmentation: Unraveling Its Imperative Impact on Male Infertility Based on Recent Evidence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Genetic profiling of azoospermic men to identify the etiology and predict reproductive potential.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- From the laboratory to the field: how to mitigate pregnancy losses in embryo transfer programs?Animal reproduction · 2024Review
- Article
- Age-associated epigenetic changes in mammalian sperm: implications for offspring health and development.Human reproduction update · 2023Review
- Article
- Plcz1 Deficiency Decreased Fertility in Male Mice Which Is Associated with Sperm Quality Decline and Abnormal Cytoskeleton in Epididymis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Male infertility and somatic health - insights into lipid damage as a mechanistic link.Nature reviews. Urology · 2022Review
- The TGF-β/SMAD Signaling Pathway Prevents Follicular Atresia by Upregulating MORC2.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Oxidative Stress and Idiopathic Male Infertility.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Review
- Histone Chaperones as Cardinal Players in Development.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- MicroRNA-targeting in male infertility: Sperm microRNA-19a/b-3p and its spermatogenesis related transcripts content in men with oligoasthenozoospermia.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evaluation of reproductive quality of spermatozoa by standard semen analysis is often inadequate to predict ART outcome. Men may be prone to meiotic error and have higher proportion of spermatozoa with fragmented chromatin, capable of affecting the conceptus' health. In men with unexplained infertility, supplementary tests may be pivotal to gain insight into the paternal contribution to the zygotic genome. A total of 113 consenting men were included in the study, with an additional 5 donor specimens used as control. Among study participants, 87 were screened for sperm aneuploidy by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and ranked according to their increasing age. A total of 18 men were assessed by whole exome sequencing and categorized according to their reproductive outcome as either fertile or infertile. Another set of men (n = 13) had their gene expression analyzed by RNA-seq and were profiled according to their reproductive capacity. FISH revealed that the average aneuploidy rate was highest for men over-55 age group (9.6%), while men >55 had the highest average disomy for chromosomes 17(1.2%) and 18(1.3%). ART results for the entire cohort comprised 157 cycles, stratified by paternal age. The youngest age group (25-30 years) had a fertilization rate of 87.7% which decreased to 46.0% in the >55 age group. Clinical pregnancy rate was highest in the 25-30yr group (80.0%) while no pregnancies were attained in the >55 age groups. Pregnancy loss was characterized by a steadily increasing trend, highest in the 51-55 age group (50.0%). NGS was performed on a cohort of patients classified as having recurrent pregnancy loss. This cohort was classified as the infertile group (n = 10) and was compared to a control group (n = 8) consisting of patients successfully treated by ART. Eight couples in 17 ICSI cycles achieved a clinical pregnancy rate of 82.4% while 10 infertile couples treated in 21 cycles achieved a pregnancy rate of 23.8%, all resulting in pregnancy loss. DNA-sequencing on spermatozoa from these patients yielded overall aneuploidy of 4.0% for fertile and 8.6% for the infertile group (P<0.00001). In the infertile cohort, we identified 17 genes with the highest mutation rate, engaged in key roles of gametogenesis, fertilization and embryo development. RNA-seq was performed on patients (n = 13) with normal semen analyses. Five men unable to attain a pregnancy after ART were categorized as the infertile group, while 8 men who successfully sustained a pregnancy were established as the fertile control. Analysis resulted in 86 differentially expressed genes (P<0.001). Of them, 24 genes were overexpressed and 62 were under-expressed in the infertile cohort. DNA repair genes (APLF, CYB5R4, ERCC4 and TNRFSF21) and apoptosis-modulating genes (MORC1, PIWIL1 and ZFAND6) were remarkably under-expressed (P<0.001). Sperm aneuploidy assessment supported by information on gene mutations may indicate subtle dysfunctions of the spermatozoon. Furthermore, by querying noncoding RNA we may gather knowledge on embryo developmental competence of spermatozoa, providing crucial information on the etiology of unexplained infertility of the infertile male.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.